Aziz bm, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Aziz bm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of HungerStation edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HungerStation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•AC) This message was left at 00:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nova (company) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nova (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Aziz bm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Nova (company), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
  Hello, Aziz bm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the notificate, i’m a new user in wikipedia and i don’t have any background about it’s laws so i apologies if If you misunderstand about me, no, i did not create articles for advertising, these companies and brands are very popular in my country and i used to create an articles about them for their popularity ، thats it Aziz bm (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Aziz bm, I might have realized that, If you need help my talk page is open. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 18:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Aziz bm I see you have created a draft at Draft:HungerStation. That's an excellent start to work on your new article, build it to completion and have it peer reviewed for publication. The article is a good start, however it will need additional sourcing to be minimally viable in article space. Synoman Barris has posted some links below that should help you get under way. Two thresholds are: the article should be written from a neutral point of view, without promotion (WP:NPOV) and it requires sufficient independent, realiable sources to show notability (WP:NORG). Once you feel the article is ready for publication, simply click the "submit" button on the AfC template I added to the article. Another editor will then review your article, give further comments or - if appropriate - publish the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 23:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Aziz bm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 18:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: HungerStation (July 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
User:Aziz bm - If you have questions about my decline of Draft:HungerStation, you can ask for the comments of other editors at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: HungerStation (July 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 12:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mohammed bin Salman, you may be blocked from editing. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Page block from Mohammed bin Salman edit

You have been blocked for two months from Mohammed bin Salman for persistent tendentious editing, removal of sourced content, and edit warring. Note that you have not been blocked from the article's talkpage, so you can still discuss edits and attempt to gain consensus. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 13:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC).Reply

Blocked edit

You have been blocked for 2 months for tendentious editing, in particular for making a tendentious move of an article without any talkpage discussion. You knew perfectly well that the move was controversial, as you have tried it before,[1] and been reverted because there wasn't consensus for the move. And yet you moved it again, without even trying to get consensus. The next time I will block you indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 13:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC).Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Aziz bader per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aziz bader. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 00:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply