Avestaboy
Welcome edit
|
Re: Pasadena (TV Series) edit
Just looked at it and it seems normal? Make sure you're on en.wikipedia.org for the english Wikipedia. Hemingray (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 edit
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tom Felton have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Re: Nicole Paggi edit
Took a look at it and your revisions, Did see some hints of non-english language. This can be fixed by simply subbing the proper english spellings. When editing Wikipedia make sure you are on the proper version for your language (Example: en.wikipedia.org). Hemingray (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 edit
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Joseph Smith— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murat river, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
October 2020 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicholas Rowe (actor). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 16:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry It wasn't on purpose. Avestaboy (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello Avestaboy. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Tanja Bruske, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Avestaboy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Avestaboy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. signed, Rosguill talk 21:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Tanja Bruske for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanja Bruske is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanja Bruske until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 21:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)