User talk:Atlantic306/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Atlantic306. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Please comment on Talk:Current members of the United States Senate
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Current members of the United States Senate. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Is that edit on Go North East better?
Yes, much better, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Tim McGraw
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tim McGraw. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Tom Hiddleston
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tom Hiddleston. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Meghan Markle
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Meghan Markle. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Zoë Quinn
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zoë Quinn. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Me Too (hashtag)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Me Too (hashtag). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
- Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
- If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
- A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
- Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
- ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
- The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Fatima
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fatima. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Trace Adkins
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trace Adkins. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Article Image Contribution
Thanks for letting me know on Bartow High School about the image posting guidelines on Wikipedia. The upload wizard never told me about not using thumbnails! Simsnet (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Glad to help Atlantic306 (talk) 12:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Central Michigan Life
I saw you de-prodded Central Michigan Life. Could you also comment on the talk page? The thread "notable alumni" started about alumni of the publication, but then shifted to overall article notability.
While I did add several refs, they are all trivial mentions (school name on various award lists), with no in-depth coverage. I am not familiar enough with the awards mentioned and now sourced, but my feel from reading about them is that only one of them is potentially significant enough to establish notability - but even that one is debateable as the school was a finalist, not a winner of the award.
Your comments on the talk page related to the notability would be appreciated. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Miranda Lambert
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Miranda Lambert. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Alexander High School (Mississippi)
Hi Atlantic306. You recently removed a picture of the old Alexander High School with an edit caption "school not in picture". Why? Thanks!Jacona (talk) 13:36, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Toby Keith
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Toby Keith. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Slobodan Praljak
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Slobodan Praljak. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Request to restore Vanessa Braxton page
Hello, Atlantic306 I am requesting the page Vanessa Braxton be restored so that I can make the compliance changes (edits). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:VanessaBraxton. Is it possible to insert in the Sandbox? Thanks, Vanessa Braxton (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Vanessa Braxton.
Please comment on Talk:Bruno Bettelheim
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bruno Bettelheim. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Josephine Butler
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Josephine Butler. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Reba McEntire
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Reba McEntire. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Richard Sakwa
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard Sakwa. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Twitter template
Hi there,
what's wrong with this diff? I just aimed at clearing out this cat.
NAH 13:56, 23 December 2017 (UTC).
- Hi, sorry my mistake as confused the previous edit, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- No matter! Good continuation. NAH 14:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC).
Please comment on Talk:George Pell
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Pell. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Demisexuality
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Demisexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Syed Moiz Balkhi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syed Moiz Balkhi. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Shunyata
Dear Atlantic306! Can you make about short movie Shunyata, starring Jackie Shroff, find plot and references? Thank you! --178.71.222.210 (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, you should ask Editor 2050 (talk · contribs) as he is much better than me at article creation, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Peter Strzok
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Strzok. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018! | |
Hello Atlantic306, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
- Thanks, for the card and for helping on my talkpage, best wishes Atlantic306 (talk) 13:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:More Life
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:More Life. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The New York Times
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The New York Times. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
New Years new page backlog drive
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
- The total number of reviews completed for the month.
- The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark. Legobot (talk) 04:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Record charts
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Record charts. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Unite the Right rally
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Unite the Right rally. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
restoring dead link
What value is this [1]? Toddst1 (talk) 19:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, The link was working until recently when Absolute Punk was wiped out from internet archive due to a successor site using robotext. If that site changes the link may be recoverable, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bahar Mustafa race row incident
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bahar Mustafa race row incident. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Roy Moore
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roy Moore. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Elizabeth II
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elizabeth II. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Billie Lourd
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Billie Lourd. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kenny Biddle
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kenny Biddle. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Carroll Quigley
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carroll Quigley. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
George Bancroft
The image you are using is not a good one. It’s low resolution and nothing particually special. I feel the one I have submitted which has his face times four is a better representation of George. Parkerbros (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Parkerbros, regardless of your feelings, both of you should now proceed to the "discuss" phase of WP:BRD. Take it to the talk page. Come to a compromise. I'd hate to have to block either of you for edit warring. Primefac (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
- Primefac (talk · contribs) A block warning is a bit quick for a couple of reverts over a week. Have restored the image Parkerbros wanted at George Bancroft (actor) but think it may be a copyvio as it has a copyright from a movie magazine dated 1930, can you please advise whether that is public domain? Atlantic306 (talk) 13:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if it came across as a harsh warning, it was mostly just that I hate it when people can't stop reverting until one or both of them cross 3RR (even if it's a slow-burning edit war that takes multiple days). I didn't mean to imply that either of you were at that point right now.
- As for the image, it looks like it's in the public domain (see {{PD-US-not renewed}}) so it should be acceptable for Wikipedia. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, will take your advice to discuss more except for vandals and spammersAtlantic306 (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Primefac (talk · contribs) A block warning is a bit quick for a couple of reverts over a week. Have restored the image Parkerbros wanted at George Bancroft (actor) but think it may be a copyvio as it has a copyright from a movie magazine dated 1930, can you please advise whether that is public domain? Atlantic306 (talk) 13:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Nouman Ali Khan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nouman Ali Khan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:The Harvard Crimson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Harvard Crimson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:James D. Zirin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James D. Zirin. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Carolina Nairne
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carolina Nairne. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Manish Kumar Page Deletion
I contest that this page should not be deleted because although it may sound promotional but the list of achievements of Manish Kumar are factual. Also, there are several wiki pages already which highlight the achievements of businessmen across the globe. This is no different. Please share your thought on this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrugeshsingh (talk • contribs) 06:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Joshua Claybourn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Claybourn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Claybourn (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Notifying you about the discussion, since you have made significant contributions to articles related to this subject. --IndyNotes (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
"Promising drafts"
Hi, Atlantic306,
I've been running across drafts tagged as "promising" but so far, this is a tag that I've found that is only being used by you, at least in Spring 2020. I think it's great to delay deletion of a promising draft as long as these drafts are eventually reviewed by an editor and worked on. I hope that drafts in Category:Promising draft articles are reviewed by you or other editors and submitted to AfC when they are ready. Hopefully other editors working in the AfC area know about this category and regularly check out the drafts in it.
These tags won't delay deletion indefinitely, at least not for this admin. And I'm not sure other admins working with G13s will notice the tag, but let's hope they do and allow them to have 6 more months of time to be improved upon. Thanks for the work you do. Liz Read! Talk! 00:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for noting these tags. Some editors such as Kvng are nominating and improving some of them for review but some others need more work, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Bruno Turner already has a long bio article in the standard reference work on classical music
The first paragraph can be viewed free at https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000043616?rskey=GoCFIt Therefore the delete rationale is invalid. 08:16, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
My article was declined
I had factual information on the subject how was my review denied? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnrobb459 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Because the information was not referenced to WP:reliable sources to verify it. All Wikipedia non-list articles need references to prove that the information is true. Details of how to write references are at WP:REFB, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Karikku (web series)
My article was reviewed once and declined. I have added new sources and have resubmitted it. Please comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atlantis77177 (talk • contribs) 06:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Help?
Hi. Can you please take a look here, and see if there is a way to promote this movie draft? Thanks. Draft talk:Jarhead: Law of Return. --2604:2000:E010:1100:7901:7BC:9665:2F53 (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, will look at it tomorrow evening, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks much. I just also posted on the project page, as was suggested to me. Best.--2604:2000:E010:1100:943E:8385:E170:7619 (talk) 06:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Have commented on the draft talkpage, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. So if it is not an article in itself, how much can be inserted into the Jarhead article? The actors, for instance? 2604:2000:E010:1100:4992:A0ED:F7D3:7658 (talk) 04:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- Have commented on the draft talkpage, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks much. I just also posted on the project page, as was suggested to me. Best.--2604:2000:E010:1100:943E:8385:E170:7619 (talk) 06:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Suggest about a paragraph about it including just the leading actors and director and other information, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
British Army Structure In 2010
Hardly any of the archive sources directly point to 2010 and why is that year chosen? Army 2020 was created in 2013. Why is a massive orbat of circa 2010 - no reference provided by the blocked user who created the article - and when there are pages like Army 2020 and Future of the British Army which neatly show the changes needed. Most units in British Army Structure In 2010 weren't even actual units. I didn't see you help improve the article simply remove the PROD. Reply here please not on my talk page. BlueD954 (talk) 03:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Army_Structure_In_2010#References - Show me one of these 'references' given by blocked user User:J-Man11 that show the units listed were as of 2010 and why 2010 is significant to meet WP:GNG. Reply here, or on the article. BlueD954 (talk) 11:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- See WP:PROD a prod can be removed without giving a reason or editing the article. I gave a reason, if you disagree take it to WP:AFD. I did check and the Army 2020 article does not describe in detail the existing structure, if it did this article could be redirected to it. Finally as per WP:NEXIST the sources in the article are not the only sources to be considered, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- You gave the weakest case to remove a PROD before the dateline and made no reason to show why it is at 2010. Basically you have no argument in "the Army 2020 article does not describe in detail the existing structure, if it did this article could be redirected to it" by making no effort to improve the page. I see all you work on is Indian and Paki stuff. BlueD954 (talk) 01:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- See WP:NPA, you will be blocked if you make anymore racial comments and racist terms, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
Ryan Avery
Hi Atlantic306 I would like to ask for your help in creating an article for Ryan Avery. I understand I made a couple of mistakes before and would like to make it right this time. Is it okay if I create a draft article in the articles for creation and get your inputs in the article from there? I ask you here first so I know if I am making the right move and would not be banned if I try to recreate the article again. Let me know and I would greatly appreciate your assistance. I hope you are having a great day! User talk:Azumi121 —Preceding undated comment added 04:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Naeun's page
"Reverted to revision 986708932 by Abdotorg (talk): Needs a reference" - whoever you are
Then explain why most of the other Kpop idols' articles say that they're mononymously known by just their given names, including her own bandmates. That being said, reference to what? Naeun is just her name, and if someone is just known by a single name that is simply their given name, we wouldn't even need a reference to anything. 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:81:F27D:9ADB:24BD (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- If you look through the references they all refer to her full name and that is what we go by, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 01:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- So? What about the other members? 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:81:F27D:9ADB:24BD (talk) 01:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- If they are not referred to mononumously in reliable sources then they should be changed as well, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Then how is Jisoo of Blackpink mononymously referred to as just Jisoo? 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:81:F27D:9ADB:24BD (talk) 01:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Because a number of the references refer to her by Jisoo instead of her full name. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- I still don't get what you meant by "stable". At least my edits weren't vandalism, so why do you keep putting my edits on the same level as vandal ones? 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:81:F27D:9ADB:24BD (talk) 01:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- It doesn't even matter what the so-called "references" say, at least "better known mononymously as Naeun" is still a harmless edit nonetheless, especially most of us (as in fans) just call her Naeun anyways. 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:81:F27D:9ADB:24BD (talk) 01:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Its not a fan page its an encyclopedia. Im finished with this Atlantic306 (talk) 01:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Same. Thanks for wasting my time. 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:81:F27D:9ADB:24BD (talk) 01:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Zoe Palandri for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoe Palandri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoe Palandri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 09:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Deletion for Sastha Aravind
Sir, can I have a clearer discussion with respect to this. Vasudharini (talk) 03:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, the speedy deletion will be determined by an admin who will consider whether the article is sufficiently promotional to qualify for speedy deletion, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Raymond Vincenti for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond Vincenti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Vincenti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 20:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Budweiser Events Center
I'm the director of marketing for this venue. I know the most current and accurate information. Please quit reverting my correct and current updates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.19.1.10 (talk) 20:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- See WP:PROMO and WP:COI, you are not supposed to use wikipedia for marketing, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Yuriy Reznikov
Hello! Thank you for your suggestions - I just had one question: are the requirements different for the biographies of a deceased person?
"The article Yuriy Reznikov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article."
Unfortunately, Yuriy Reznikov is not alive. Thanks !
Mitya22 (talk) 19:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Mitya22
- Hi, that was my mistake. No problems now, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Schools and notability
Hi — you recently dePRODded Caribou High School, which you're perfectly entitled to do, of course. However, in your edit note you suggested that schools don't need to satisfy the notability requirements (if I understood correctly?). That's not what WP:NSCHOOL says, though: "All universities, colleges and schools [...] must satisfy either this guideline (WP:ORG) or the general notability guideline, or both." IMO, the article in question, as written, satisfies neither. Happy to be proven wrong, though, in case I've misinterpreted something. :) Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, @DoubleGrazing: the first paragraph of WP:NORG says "The scope of this guideline covers all groups of people organized together for a purpose with the exception of non-profit educational institutions, religions or sects, and sports teams" and that is the outcome of an RFC that I remember. Agree that they should pass WP:GNG and have amended the WP:NSCHOOL paragraph accordingly, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
What do you mean by "Third party" tag for a 1909 magazine? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Hi, it is a current magazine that started in 1909 and has an ongoing awards section and a current sister publication so independent sources should be available, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Article up for deletion
It has been proposed that List of fugitives from justice who are no longer sought be deleted. Feel free to share your thoughts on this matter. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)