Asik5678

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sivak5678 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 05:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Abusing multiple accounts

Hi. I just blocked an alternate account of yours per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asik5678. Please note that using multiple accounts to vote for yourself in an RfA is in violation of Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry. Any further socking will result in a block of this account as well. Tiptoety ^talk 06:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

My reversion of your edits on Saffron terror

Please discuss here. Silverseren^C 05:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Saffron Terror, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blue Rasberry 05:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Manitha Neethi Pasarai. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Blue Rasberry 16:16, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to National Development Front. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare ^talk 16:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Popular Front of India. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Popular Front of India. Tommy! [message] 17:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Asik tepm

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Asik tepm. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Popular Front of India. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Popular Front of India - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. noq (talk) 18:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

• It ocurred to me that tepm might just possibly be a typo for temp. Temporary user pages are allowed but please note that in your case their names must start with User:Asik5678/ . — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Disruption

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Popular Front of India, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please cease removing sourced content Nuujinn (talk) 18:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Asik5678 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

94.57.173.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Disruptive editing: edit warring

• Blocking administrator: HJ Mitchell (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 08:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

unblock my username

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asik5678 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

popular front of india articles publised wrong information about the organisation Proof...... 1. "Naya karavan" means principles of caravan but displaced as "new travelling group" (http://spokensanskrit.de/index.php?script=DI&tinput=naya&country_ID=&trans=Translate&direction=AU)

2. This orgz running schools, orphan house etc...( pls see http://popularfrontindia.com/pp/taxonomy/term/43)

3. "Attack on Professor T J Joseph" - this attack was not related to this organazation but this orgz one of the culprit done this non-sense thing, after police investigation is going on (http://twocircles.net/2010aug04/no_evidence_terrorism_kerala_central_home_ministry.html)

see the history of popular front of india asik5678 - i am enter correct data but some guys using techniqs against me.

i am new to wiki, pls protect the article from vandalising the article

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for and you will not repeat that behavior or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Toddst1 (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asik5678 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

ip vandalise happen in that article, some untrue matters are given by Rick jens and Eagles247. popular front of india article is purely political and social group (schools,missions) but article mention as fundamental, extremist etc...

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Love Jihad

Hello. I declined the speedy deletion of Love Jihad because the reason you provided is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion. Please see WP:CSD for details concerning appropriate criteria for speedy deletion.

If you would like to delete the article, I recommend using WP:AfD. As a less extreme alternative, you might want to propose renaming the article at Talk:Love Jihad. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 06:43, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts despite previous warning to insert multiple speedy deletion requests as already declined above. Please also review my answer at Talk:Love Jihad. You may feel offended but what you're doing is not the right answer and disruptive. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tikiwont (talk) 20:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Please see also unblock requests at User_talk:Mohasik. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:T. P. M. Mohideen Khan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:T. P. M. Mohideen Khan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr Mohamed Ayub

The article Dr Mohamed Ayub has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Dr Mohamed Ayub, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Basti and Khalilabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:J. M. Aaron Rashid.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:J. M. Aaron Rashid.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mohammed Ayub.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Mohammed Ayub.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dr Mohammed Ayub.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr Mohammed Ayub.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)