Arun singh Yaduvanshi

Welcome!

Hi Arun singh Yaduvanshi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! - Sitush (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Please note

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

- Sitush (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Pooja Yadav for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pooja Yadav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Yadav until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Signature 13:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Pooja Yadav is a superior female officer of Lucknow. He has done a very good work in Lucknow, so according to me this article should remain. I am working on it It is a well-known female officer. Apart from this, I want to write about another IAS officer Pranjal Yadav, who is a very famous officer. They have done better work in Varanasi including Azamgarh.(Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC))

Sorry, she has done a very good in lucknow.* (Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 15:03, 8 June 2020 (UTC)).

June 2020

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yadu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank You, You are right brother. I had not noticed. (Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 19:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC))

Hello!

Please I would like to greet and welcome to Wikipedia you name sound like an Indian man are you? Tbiw (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, You are right. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, You are right. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Pranjal Yadav. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 05:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

I have added only the correct category which is related to Pranjal Yadav. It does not contain any poorly referenced information. He is an IAS officer. He belongs to the Government of Uttar Pradesh. He has been selected by UPSC. So please check again. Thank You Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 06:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhupendra Yadav, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kota and Bharatpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Bhaukal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bhaukal, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 14:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok sir, Thank You. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

I have added many sources for the subject of this article. I think that would be enough. Will be added if more sources are required. Along with this, the subject of the article will also be extended. Review article. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Help talk:Talk pages, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. At the top of the page which you were editing, in the prominent box, it says: "Please do not post anything about other Wikipedia articles here. This page is only for discussing the help page on using talk pages. Every article has its own talk page, if you want to discuss subjects relating to an article please post it on the article's own talk page, not here." David Biddulph (talk) 09:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Balarama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rohini

Gopas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bhaskar

Navniet Sekera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bhaskar

Pranjal Yadav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Patrika

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

There is no such thing. Click is wrong telling. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 12:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

The bot which left the message above was not "wrong telling": for example...

Balarama: you added a link to Rohini, then another editor tagged it as "disambiguation needed" and you corrected it yourself

Gopas still has a link to Bhaskar

Pranjal Yadav: You added a link to Patrika which is still there.

There is a useful gadget which helps you to notice when you are linking to a disambiguation page: go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and near the bottom of the "Appearances" section you will find "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange". Tick that box and it will improve your editing. In any case you should always check that every link you make goes to the right article, not to an article on a different topic you weren't thinking of. Happy Editing. PamD 13:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

The link to the Gopa article which was in the death status was corrected. Rohini in Balaram article, but this name is not a separate page, that's why there is a problem. Pranjal Yadav's status is correct. Thank you. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 13:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Stubs

Thank you for your recent edit to Begha, but please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article which already has a specific stub tag, and remember that all stub tags go at the foot of the article, not the top - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. PamD 13:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the mistake, I did not pay attention. I thought the article is short, so I put the tag, so that it can be expanded further. Thank You.Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 13:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Please pay attention while you are editing this precious encyclopedia. Yes it is short, so it had a stub tag already, in the right place. PamD 13:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 13:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Paragraphs

If you are adding text and want it to appear in paragraphs you need not just one "return" but two at the end of each paragraph. I have fixed the "story" section of Veer Lorik so that what you typed as paragraphs appears as such.

Please always look at your work after you have edited, to make sure that it is as good as you hope it to be, and if it isn't looking right then try to fix it. Thanks. PamD 13:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok, Thank You. Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhojpuri music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Correct.Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 06:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Bans Geet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bans Geet, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

I was just going to add government sources immediately. You finished it. Give me only 5 minutes.Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 17:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

I have added the source and that is the government source. I am able to add the source of each part. Please do this and get him out of the draft.Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bans Geet (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bans Geet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bans Geet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬 18:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Arun singh Yaduvanshi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ Amkgp 💬 18:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bans Geet (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bans Geet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bans Geet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Navniet Sekera moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Navniet Sekera, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 08:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:Navniet Sekera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft Draft:Bhaukal will in my opinion be rejected for not being in Wikipedia format. It is just one long block of text. Suggest you model it after existing articles about Indian TV shows. David notMD (talk) 10:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@David notMD Can u see again, I have made some changes. Thank you Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 04:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

I am not a reviewer, so all I am doing is providing an opinion. Look at existing articles such as Aarya (Indian TV series), 24 (Indian TV series), CID (Indian TV series), Hostages (Indian TV series)... All of these have sections. Your draft does not. David notMD (talk) 07:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Agreed. There are multiple issues with the draft, including the fact that the main text ("Premise") is all one jumbled paragraph, where some is perhaps about the web series and some is perhaps about the real person it's based on, but there is not much to tell the reader which is which. It is also very promotionally written, and has multiple sources that don't meet WP:RS. Having as many sources as possible is absolutely not the goal, and Draft:Bhaukal as well as Draft:Navniet Sekera suffer from having quite a few poor sources, which will probably make it less likely that they are accepted when they are reviewed.

The benchmark reviewers should use is whether a draft would be more likely than not to survive a deletion discussion – an accepted draft can still be deleted through such a discussion, of course, but a draft that would stand very little chance shouldn't be accepted. --bonadea contributions talk 22:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

I am working on it right now.Arun singh Yaduvanshi (talk) 05:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Arun singh Yaduvanshi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Bhaukal, Review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhaukal (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Padavalamkuttanpilla was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhaukal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bhaukal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Padavalam  ►  14:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navniet Sekera has been accepted

Navniet Sekera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 06:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bhaukal

Hello, Arun singh Yaduvanshi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhaukal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bhaukal

Hello, Arun singh Yaduvanshi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhaukal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 16:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)