User talk:ArturSik/Archive 1

August 2014

Hello, I'm IPadPerson. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pixie Lott, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ghost (Ella Henderson song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Ella Henderson – Chart history: Adult Pop Songs |publisher=''[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]'')|accessdate=October 24, 2014}}</ref>
• Ella Henderson – Chart history: Heatseekers Songs |publisher=''[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]'')|accessdate=October 24, 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Leona Lewis

Cheryl has had 8 top five singles: "Heartbreaker" (4), "Fight for This Love" (1), "3 Words" (3), "Parachute" (5), "Promise This" (1), "Call My Name" (1), "Crazy Stupid Love" (1), "I Don't Care" (1). That is a total of 8 songs. Furthermore, this article here states that Cheryl Cole had 6 top five singles as of December 2013. Since then, both "Crazy Stupid Love" and "I Don't Care" have gone to number one, bringing her total to 8, meaning that Leona and Cheryl are now tied for British Female solo artist with the most top 5 singles.  — ₳aron 10:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ewelina Lisowska

added a link pointing to Cha-cha-cha

Izabella St. James

added a link pointing to English

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Margaret (singer)

Hello: I had a bit of time and had a look at the first two sections of your article Margaret (singer)- the lead and Career Beginnings. I have made only minor changes; on the whole you write very well in English. I did leave two notes where you should clarify your statements. Regards. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sylwia Grzeszczak page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Margaret (singer)

Hello Artur Silk:

I see that you submitted your article to the Guild of Copy Editors with a request for an edit. The way this works, and it's explained on the page, is that the articles are tackled, roughly in the order they are received, by Guild members. Depending on how busy they are, this can take 3 or 4 weeks. There is currently a drive to clear up the backlog of April's articles, so it may be some time before anyone can look at your article. If I can, I will try to have a look at it but I am helping with the April backlog so it may be a while.

Thanks for your patience.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cool Me Down, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Margaret (singer)

Hello ArturSik:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Margaret (singer) has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#3). I suggest that you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop “dead links” over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the “Save Page Now” box on the archive.org site and click save. This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=1 June 2016}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Swedish charts

Hi. You can see also pdf files with certyfications in Sweden. Type "site:ifpi.se filetype:pdf" in search. Eurohunter (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

[1] Eurohunter (talk) 19:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

CMD

Dlaczego co chwile wywalasz różne listy przebojów z artykułu Cool Me Down, jakby to był Twój plac zabaw? Myślę, że lista grecka mogła zostać, bo pokazuje popularność piosenki w tym kraju. Co chwile Ty i jakieś inne dwa mokre ultrasy coś zmieniacie i zamiast skupić się na pokazaniu popularności to wywalacie jedno za drugim, a i tak tylko Polacy wchodzą na te artykuły. Więc może nawet mały popkulturalny patriotyzm włącz, a nie robienie bałaganu i milion edycji każdego tygodnia. Nie mam tu konta, więc odpisz mi tu, jeżeli w ogóle chcesz, ale przede wszystkim pomyśl nad tym co napisane i się ogarnij. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.21.217.243 (talk) 08:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your edits

Please use edit summaries for your contributions. It helps inform people what you are doing when revising pages. I've told you before that these should be used, and am not sure why you don't seem to use them very often. Using them will benefit everyone. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Romanian peak position for "Cool Me Down"

There's also a written issue of each chart provided by Media Forest, the power for the Romanian Radio Airplay Chart. "Cool Me Down" seems to have reached its peak position here at number 14. Note that you have to combine the Romanian and international peaks to achieve an overall chart. Hope I could help, Cartoon network freak (talk) 05:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

I see I need to explain you some things. The Airplay 100 is powered by Media Forest and thus uses data published daily and weekly on their website. Until end of 2015 (I don't know exactly), the Airplay 100 used only the Radio Airplay data for their chart, but now the chart on Kiss FM is different because they also mix TV Airplay (also provided by Media Forest) when calculating new charts. However, it's reliable to use both sources, and if you want to, you can use two chart for the article:

1. Romania (Media Forest) → 14
2. Romania (Airplay 100) → 22

I'm afraid you understood me wrong. I'm going to fix the Romanian peak on the article by myself later this day to see what I mean. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

OK, so: You can use two entries for the article:

1. Romania (Airplay 100) at number 22 ...and...
2. Romania Radio Songs (Media Forest) ...so you have the official chart and one based just on the radio airplay. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

No, no you're not bothering me at all. We're here on Wikipedia to build a community not to be shy to ask some questions. In reply to your question, I now know you have not understood the things going on with the Romanian charts (it was complicated for me too at the beginning of my work here). Thus, I try to explain this to you as easily as I can once again.

1. Media Forest, a reliable monitoring service, kindly provides us weekly reports of airplay in Romania (the reports are like the one I showed you, incorporating separate sections of TV and radio airplay).
2. The Airplay 100, the new official chart after the cancelling of the Romanian Top 100, uses data provided by the measurements done by Media Forest. BUT, their chart renders together TV AND radio airplay statistics.
3. So, now we have for "Cool Me Down" number 22 in Romania on the official chart (Airplay 100), BUT why don't include the number 14 position as well when we have raw statistics for the song ONLY on Romanian radio? Because of this I meant you can incorporate something like "Romanian Radio Songs" in the article, but NOT as an official chart for Romania (in Poland you also have Polish Dance, Polish Airplay 100, Polish Airplay New etc..)
4. The article about the Media Forest chart itself questioned by you on my talk page is just a list of no1s on the radio airplay section provided by Media Forest.

Is all clear now? Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you've heard it right, it's number 22. Also, it is her highest position there, as she falls the next week to number 27. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Adele discography, you may be blocked from editing. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ArturSik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ArturSik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Margaret (singer)

Hello:

I've had a look at your revised article and made only a very few minor changes. It looks fine. I archived your second citation, citation #1 could not be archived, and I do urge you to archive the rest so that the article doesn't develop "dead" links. I provided you with directions you can refer to in my note after the GOCE edit.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

You want to add the archived URLs now so that if the original link ceases to work, the archived link will still allow readers to see the citation.

Here's an example The Little Mermaid II: Pinball Frenzy I'm just finishing editing where all the links that can be archived have been. Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Margaret (singer) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Margaret - New Sections

Hello:

I've had a look at the new sections as you requested. I think the role model and influences could be included in the "Early Beginning" section.

The Add the Blond material should go in the 2014 section. You write that "Wasted" interpolates "Our Neighbour". Interpolates means "insert". Do you mean her song is "inspired" by "Our Neighbours"? In any case, that material should go with the other information on the song in the 2014 section. This applies to the information on "Cool Me Down" as well.

The Matt Dusk reference repeats what is already in the article so the "Artistry" section becomes unnecessary.

As to the "Public Image" section. You already discuss the "Thank You Very Much" video in the 2012-2013 section. So if you feel additional details are necessary, they should go there, I think. You don't want to overdo it though - it's only one aspect of her career. There's a fine line between it being a detail about her career and slipping over into becoming an article about the video.

The paragraph beginning "Margaret's style..." could remain in the "Public Image" section. I would move the final paragraph - "In 2014 the singer... to the "Other Ventures" section.

Hope this is useful.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Margaret

Hi there! My copyediting of the article is now complete. About the 'Best Artist in Web', I don't know which is correct and which is not since I don't understand Polish. Also, don't you think you should add the original title for the category?

If you have any question/doubt about my edits, feel free to ask or revert. Cheers, FrB.TG (talk) 16:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Good luck with making it a GA. I would advise to leave no unreferenced entry in the music video table. Perhaps also consider shifting the info from personal life section elsewhere. I am not really a fan of a one-line section. - FrB.TG (talk) 07:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

It looks good. - FrB.TG (talk) 12:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Nick Berry page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margaret discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All I Need. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Vibes (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Margaret GA nominee

Hi, I was just wondering whether you have applied for Margaret (singer) being a good article nominee? It seems that the article is well composed and referenced. Oliszydlowski (TALK) 16:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@Oliszydlowski: Yes I have, I am now waiting for someone to review it. ArturSik (talk) 07:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Margaret (singer)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Margaret (singer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Margaret (singer)

The article Margaret (singer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Margaret (singer) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Margaret (singer)

The article Margaret (singer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Margaret (singer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Margaret (singer)

Hello:

I have now run through the revised version of Margaret (singer) as you asked, and it's writing is now GA standard. I have removed all the links to Wikipedia articles on various cities mentioned since they are incidental to the focus of the article and constitute overlinking.

I notice that many of the article's statements are supported by more than one citation. I suggest that you read this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_overkill and if it applies to the citations you've used, the least notable duplicate citation should be removed. You only need one reputable citation per statement.

In this paragraph

"Margaret has named the Polish singer Grażyna Łobaszewska as a role model and her biggest inspiration.[118] She has cited Miroslava Duma[119] and Gwen Stefani as her inspirations in fashion.[120] Some of her other idols are: Tom Odell,[121] India Arie,[2] Bruno Mars,[6] Jarle Bernhoft,[9] Diana Krall,[75] Rihanna,[115] Marek Grechuta,[115] Alicia Keys,[115] Jessie Ware,[115] Charlie Winston[122] and her childhood idol Agnieszka Chylińska of O.N.A..[2]"

you seem to have looked for, and included, every instance you could find where Margaret has spoken of her idols. This has the effect of turning the article into a "list". I would suggest you pick two or three of the most notable artists, list them, and then add "among others" to cover the rest.

You want to avoid turning the article into a "diary" of absolutely everything she does or says; only notable events or actions should be added now, in my opinion.

I hope this is helpful.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Came back to know that Margaret (singer) has been promoted to good article status. Congratulations and good job on other Margaret related articles. - FrB.TG (talk) 19:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martine McCutcheon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Cheryl

Hi, ArturSik! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Cheryl, a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Cheryl. Thanks and best regards! Linguisttalk|contribs 20:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Margaret (singer)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Margaret (singer) begun by Miniapolis has been completed by me.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

I reworded the painting bit since it was a one off. I thought painting might be another area she is involved in. Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Why did you revert the edit about the birthplace in the infobox now? my solution catered to both sides, and is an appropriate middle ground. You and the other guy edit-warring on the article...it seems slightly childish. And please read WP:OWN. I also see problems with competence. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 09:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

You have comments here. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Lady gaga and lupus

Greetings Lady gaga tested +ve for Lupus in 2010. However, the antibody levels were too low to merit a diagnosis. The movie 5' 2" never mentions she has lupus or the 2010 test. She does , however, mention a long-standing hip injury. Your references contradict all this. Since this is a biography of a living person I believe it would be prudent to remove the lupus information until a source outside of an an article about an Netflix documentary can be found. Wlmg (talk) 13:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Martine McCutcheon

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Martine McCutcheon has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

• Twofingered Typist everything looks good. Thank you. ArturSik (talk) 20:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello ArturSik:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Linguist^unEins^uno 19:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

November 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wojciech Szczęsny, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Martine McCutcheon[edit source]

Hi. To avoid edit warrings I'd like to discuss with you a couple of matters. "Whilst still in EastEnders, McCutcheon appeared in her first pantomime, playing the title role in Cinderella, at the Marlowe Theatre in Canterbury, Kent." - this should be brought back. I read her biography and this is the only mention of pantomime. You could perhaps add a sentence stating that since appearing in cinderella she appeared in many other pantomimes but you'd have to find a reference first. the information that she was offered eastenders part when she worked at knickerbox could also be brought back with this (https://quidsinmagazine.com/martine-mccutcheon/) citation. "In reality, McCutcheon had decided to leave the soap in order to embark on a pop career" - really don't understand why you've removed that part as the citation I have provided backs up this information. it says: "She claimed to have been killed off as punishment for requesting time away to launch a music career, and that she only found out about her character's death in a tabloid newspaper ("Tiff's a Stiff" ran the headline)." Hope to hear back from you soon. ArturSik (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC) Hi, thanks for this, much better way! Really dont the first pantomime is relevant at all imho, or even interesting? Knickerbox not a good source as im sure you already know, and again, its not really relevant at all imho? Again, no really good source for this at all is there? She only stated it after the event, and then only in gossip mags, therefore I dont should be included at all? Hope that makes sense to you?Simply-the-truth (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simply-the-truth (talk • contribs)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ArturSik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Sources

Hello, you may still be working on this, but can you please add your references to Philip Brodie (actor)? It's a biography of a living person so needs WP:INLINECITED sources, and at the moment it has no sources. It has 'external links' but that means suggestions for further reading rather than sources which informed the article. The link is also to imdb, which is specifically banned as a source at WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Harry R. Truman

Hi ArturSik, I was wondering if you had some time to look over Harry R. Truman and give me suggestions. I'm hoping to take it to FAC soon, so any feedback/changes you think would help improve the article would be appreciated. ceranthor 18:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Ceranthor sure thing. ArturSik (talk) 14:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Ceranthor I have just had a read through the article and found no inaccuracies. It might be bacause I haven't got enough experience but as a person who has never heard of the man and the story after reading this I have no questions meaning in my opinion there's everything that there needs to be. Whenever you decide to nominate it for FA let me know and you've got my support. ArturSik (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I'm probably going to solicit some more comments first, but I'll let you know. ceranthor 21:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lorraine Stanley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waking the Dead and Karen Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

A Comment

I made a comment on this image and the DR is withdrawn. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Leoboudv Thank you. Do I now remove the deletion template from the photo’s page ? ArturSik (talk) 08:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• No. An Admin will remove the deletion template once he/she closes the DR. But the image is passed so you can use it on wikipedia. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

belated congrats

Don't think I ever got around to congratulating you on Margaret (singer) achieving FA status. You should be very proud of your work! ceranthor 16:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you:) ArturSik (talk) 18:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Margaret

Hey Artur, I just wanted to thank you for asking me to review Margaret's article and bringing her to my attention. She's really good. I recently listened to "Cool Me Down" and it's fucking amazing. Especially the end. PanagiotisZois (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey. I'm glad to hear that:) ArturSik (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Precious

Margaret

Thank you for quality articles about female singers, such as Margaret (singer) including song, discography, awards and blue vibes, for list of awards and nominations received by Lacey Turner and your contributions to Lady Gaga, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt Thank you so much:) I really appreciate it. ArturSik (talk) 13:49, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Lady Gaga

The new photo in Lady Gaga's biography is badly edited, could you change it? I can change it for a much better photo, but I can not edit the page. AstonMartinX (talk) 01:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

If it's license free you can link it in the article's talk page here and we can look into it with other users. Best. ArturSik (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ArturSik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ArturSik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Gaga Golden Globes

Regarding this just wanted to explain that the film version of "Hello Hello" was nominated for the Golden Globes, on which Gaga is featured as a singer as well as songwriter. Hence the Academy included her name in the nomination. Hope that makes it clear :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 20:48, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

IndianBio oh, sorry. I knew there were two versions of the song and only checked the golden globes' artcile from that year to make sure which one was nominated and it didn't mention gaga so i removed it but yes my bad I probably should've checked the source that was provided. ArturSik (talk) 20:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Margaret

Wanted to express how much I like your work in this article. Did some reference tidying up through scripts and some loose-end tie-ups. You are a great editor!! —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 13:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

IndianBio thanks:) really appreciate it. ps. I've noticed you removed the 'publisher' value from some citations. why's that? ArturSik (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

ArturSik, publisher is usually not required if the work/website parameter is present per {{cite web}} templates. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

I see, thanks:) ArturSik (talk) 14:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

IndianBio do you think it is worth mentioning in her bio that the "Byle jak" music video was one of the 10 most watched Polish music videos on YT in 2018 or better to include it only in the song's article? ArturSik (talk) 20:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

I think thats only for the song article. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 20:27, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doda (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PLN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Requested copy edit of Jennifer Aniston

Note that I added a few tags about questionable sources. Overall the article is in good shape; I trust people with more subject-specific expertise than I can help balance it just right. One thing that did concern me is the extensive discussion of Aniston's ancestry—does that really reflect what the reliable sources think is significant? Kim Post (talk) 08:20, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Kim Post Thank You so much. I will take all that on board and will try to replace questionable sources. As for her ancestry I do agree that the article is a bit cluttered with that and I think her parents' roles are definitely redundant since they both have their own articles. I'm not sure how much of that should be removed tho and I don't want to get rid of something that could potentially be significant this is why I requested the article to be peer reviewed so I guess all will come out there. ArturSik (talk) 12:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Michelle Keegan

Hi. I'm letting you know that I've reverted your changes to the 'Awards and nominations' table at the article. Adding missing notable awards is fine, and adding missing sourcing is great. But completely changing the format of the table to an inferior version that does not follow WP:ACCESS properly is not. If you need help with the following WP:ACCESS part (it involves using 'rowspan' properly), please let me know. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

New version is better, but is still not WP:ACCESS-compliant. The way you're using 'rowspan' in the 'Nominated work' column is really, really bad in WP:ACCESS terms. I advise moving that column to second in the order, just after the 'Year', and then you need to 'rowspan' the 'Nominated work' column to match 'rowspan' use in the 'Year' column. Again, if you need help, just ask... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Mostly better now. There are still some 'rowspan' problems in the 'Refs' column, but that's easily fixed. Also, there is the option to 'rowspan' the 'Year' and 'Nominated works' columns together, but that's a bigger job than I want to tackle the moment... Thanks for being willing to work together on this! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

IJBall not sure if that's what you meant but fixed rowspan in the refs column. Also could you be more clear what you would like me to change in the Year and Nominated works columns? do you mean using rowspan in 'year' in order to cut down the number of each year to one? ArturSik (talk) 04:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes – the 'Refs' column is now "fixed" in WP:ACCESS terms.

As to what I was saying, let me show you an example... Currently you have this (which, FTR, is the "most" WP:ACCESS-compliant):

Year	Nominated for	Award	Category	Result	Ref.
2008	Coronation Street	TV Now Award	Favourite Newcomer to Irish	Nominated
2008	Coronation Street	British Soap Award	Best Newcomer	Won
2008	Coronation Street	Inside Soap Award	Best Couple (with Jack P. Shepherd)	Nominated
2008	Coronation Street	Inside Soap Award	Best Newcomer	Nominated
2009	Coronation Street	TV Now Award	Ireland's Sexiest TV Star	Won
2009	Coronation Street	British Soap Award	Sexiest Female	Won
2009	Coronation Street	Inside Soap Award	Sexiest Female	Won

But you can also do this:

Year	Nominated for	Award	Category	Result	Ref.
2008	Coronation Street	TV Now Award	Favourite Newcomer to Irish	Nominated
		British Soap Award	Best Newcomer	Won
		Inside Soap Award	Best Couple (with Jack P. Shepherd)	Nominated
		Inside Soap Award	Best Newcomer	Nominated
2009	Coronation Street	TV Now Award	Ireland's Sexiest TV Star	Won
		British Soap Award	Sexiest Female	Won
		Inside Soap Award	Sexiest Female	Won

The second example table is actually still WP:ACCESS-compliant, in that it is using 'rowspan' "correctly". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

References

IJBall I thought that's what you meant but don't you think it would look a bit weird if we did that? I think it could work if the nominated work was different for each year but since it doesn't change we would be repeating it and while we do that now we provide the title for every single nomination separately whereas if we where to 'rowspan' year and nominated work together we would have multiple cells with the same title one after another. I don't know it just looks a bit odd to me + if the current one meets WP:ACCESS requirements then why not just leave it as it is? ArturSik (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

In general, I actually prefer the first version for 'Awards' tables over the second. Note: If you use the first version, then the 'Nominated work' column doesn't need to be the second column – for that version, you can put 'Nominated work' back to where you originally had it... e.g.:

Year	Award	Category	Nominated for	Result	Ref.
2008	TV Now Award	Favourite Newcomer to Irish	Coronation Street	Nominated

References

However, if you have lots of awards "per year", as we do with Michelle Keegan, then using the second version with the 'rowspan' is more "justified", and is even "preferred" by many editors. FWIW... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:45, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Michelle Keegan is back to violating WP:ACCESS, as per the above discussion. Please fix. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)