April 2023 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Doki Doki Literature Club! have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mario Kart 8, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Minecraft, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

How do you source a category? Anonymous29345 (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
By adding content to the article that support the category. The film currently seems to be in development hell despite 1 source saying it is planned for 2025. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (film). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits edit

Please do not mark edits that add an entry to a disambiguation page as minor. For further explanation, read this. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Final warning for posting unsourced content edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Steel wool (disambiguation) edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Steel wool (disambiguation) edit

Hello Anonymous29345,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username The Night Watch and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Steel wool (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|The Night Watch}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

The Night Watch (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

You are blocked from editing for 2 days for repeatedly adding unsourced content. I was going to let you off with just a warning, but you've already received a final warning, and made unsourced edits both today, and 2 days ago. You really can't keep ignoring this key facet of Wikipedia. Read up on WP:V and WP:REFB if you need more help understanding. Sergecross73 msg me 20:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonic Dream Team (December 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Anonymous29345! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023 edit

  Your edit to Draft:Five Nights at Freddy's: Fazbear Frights has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Audience reviews at Woody Woodpecker Goes to Camp Article edit

Hello @Anonymous29345,

You say it's not necessary to include the audience reviews in the article. I think it schould be in the article. If someone here on Wikipedia only sees the critics' ratings, they only see the voices of the critics, but not the audience. So he doesn't see the whole criticism from both sides. HeroWikia (talk) 21:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia articles for films should only use critical reception. If you view the page for any film, you will only see the critical reception. We also provide the link to the Rotten Tomatoes page for the film so they can see both. Audience reviews can come from anyone and are not credible. Critic reviews have credibility behind them. This is not a discussion that should be had with me. I am not a Wikipedia moderator. I simply followed the rules. Also, if you cannot spell correctly, maybe you should not be editing for Wikipedia just yet. Anonymous29345 (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I know now. Thanks. HeroWikia (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:LS Mark edit

  Hello, Anonymous29345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LS Mark, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply