Alreim

Tired of Admins deleting content after 5 seconds without viewing Article or Ref.

I am reposting for the second time the article NIAMA-REISSER Technology. I am inclined to believe that somebody will delete it again, because he will take the other admins decision as granted. Well, the first person to delete the article had his actions reverted, then I used articles of creation and User 78.26 flags it as Advertisement again, although he cannot clearly state more than one thing to underline or support his decision.

Look the the references, which I am including now for the first time, since I was new at the beginning and did not know how and what did what: saving, submitting... I saved without adding the Links and references.

THE ARTICLE IS NOT ADVERTISEMENT--If you think so, read the below.

Thanks,

NIAMA-REISSER Technology Rejection[edit]

Hello there: I am responding to your rejection of my article "NIAMA-REISSER Technology". I cannot follow you based upon your comment: """Comment: more product portfolio than encyclopedia article 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 01:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)"" The article in question is by far not a PRODUCT PORTFOLIO. It is similar to the NSU Motorenwerke Page --German-- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSU_Motorenwerke Furthermore, I explicitly state the function of the engine, car and ceramic products / technologies. For instance, I go into great detail on how the CHB-Evo. engine functions. There is no sales pitch or any other info. in that portion and the article as a whole. This is entirely similar to the US wiki page from EcoMotors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EcoMotors In addition to the German Wiki Page: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelmotor Since I am new, I might have made the mistake and falsely listed all my REFERENCES along with the EXTERNAL LINKS. EcoMotors did that better, but that can be corrected asap. The reference are: Columbus Dispatch --biggest Newspaper in OHIO-, Diesel Power Magazine, Ansys, Inc. --Fortune 500 Magazine- NIAMA-REISSER, LLC Design Competition Winner, Quest for the 200 MPG Car, 81st International Geneva Auto Show ... the list goes on. They are all in my external links. That surely has to be corrected. Other than that, I believe that you have not even read the article to its entirety, or else you would have noted the above. I am new to Wikipedia and I have invested more than a weeks research in this article. It is notable and the company has more than 35 patents internationally: USA, Germany, India, China, Japan, Korea, etc. I hereby kindly request that the article is allowed and put mainstream. I have followed Wikis guidelines and my article is 100% similar to the above listed URL wiki articles. Should my article be rejected furthermore, I will kindly request that the above listed articles be deleted asap, for they too then violate wiki rules and regulations. I am looking forward to your speedy attention in this matter.

Reply

Thanks, Alreim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alreim (talk • contribs) 05:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC) First, it doesn't matter what else is on German Wikipedia, or English Wikipedia either for that matter. There are lots of things on Wikipedia that really aren't encyclopedia articles. Note: I am not saying your article isn't factual. What I am pointing out is that the article, as written, looks more like an advertisements (advertisements can be factual) for it's products than an encyclopedia article. Phrases such as "The engine has a significantly reduced frictional coefficient for that matter" belong in an advertisement brochure much more than an encyclopedia article. Please see the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. I hope that helps. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 05:31, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Response[edit]

Response

How is this article advertisement? All portions of the article explain the function of the technology. I had already added neutral sentences like: "the company claims" , "according to the company" ... So please drop the accusation and argument that this article is advertisement! You have only mentioned one sentence as a recommendation to change. Once I go over the article again, and find time to resubmit it, I don't want admins that don't read he entire article and its Citations/references delete it in 5 seconds. This is ridiculous! I would like your take on that! It almost seems like Niama-Reisser is being singled out, if compared To the articles to my previous post. Looking fwd. to your reply! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alreim (talk • contribs) 20:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Alreim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 01:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Alreim, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Talkback

Hello, Alreim. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 05:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 05:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

per above 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 14:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Section removed

I have removed your section from WP:REFUND for 3 reasons: first, it did not follow the instructions; second, it appeared to be a discussion, and third, it did not appear related to a deletion but with the rejection of the draft article WP:AFC. As per the notice on this page, an AFC rejections still gives you the opportunity to fix the draft article and resubmit it. The person who rejected it left clear reasons, and also a way to contact them for questions. Note, however, that WP:NCORP is extremely strict on what companies can exist in an encyclopedia - you should review that before initiating any further discussion ES&L 10:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Having re-reviewed the draft, I will also point you to our Manual of Style and how to use references. The "article" clearly reads like a promotional piece, and does not meet the format required for Wikipedia, or the citation rules ES&L 10:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NIAMA-REISSER Technology

Hello Alreim,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NIAMA-REISSER Technology for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NIAMA-REISSER Technology

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NIAMA-REISSER Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DES ^(talk) 05:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Some comments on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NIAMA-REISSER TECHNOLOGY

These points will be listed as they occur to me in scanning the article, not in order of importance. I am not doing the kind of through check that i would to accept or decline the draft, so this list should not be taken as comprehensive, but rather as examples and suggestion.

• "NIAMA-REISSER Technology" Wikipedia stanards are that company names hould not be in all caps, even if that is the company's preferred style. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks. This is a minor point.
• The draft should start with a description of the subject, not a narrative. "Naima-Reisser Technology is a company that...."
• "The 81st International Geneva Auto Show 2011 was the grand stage for the 1:1 unveiling of of the CHB-Evo. Engine and NR-1 car." This, particularly "grand stage" and "1:1 unveiling" is commercial puffery and should go.
• "In recent years, numerous new technologies have been created..." This should be more specific and less grandiose, such as "Since 2005, Naima-Reisser has introduced several new technologies." It should also be cited to an independent source, unless a similar statement is cited below.
• "Since the early beginnings in 2005..." all beginnings are early so this is redundant and florid in tone. "Since 2005 Naima-Reisser has..." or perhaps "Since it was founded in 2005 Naima-Reisser has..." would be better.
• "The early beginnings were in Stuttgart, Germany and Ingolstadt, Germany -2005" Make this clearer and less florid: "The company's initial locations were in Stuttgart, Germany and Ingolstadt, Germany." "plants" or "offices" or whatever is appropriate could replace "locations".
• Image galleries in the middle of text are often a mistake, they make images too small to be useful. Make sure that all images will add something significant to the user's understanding.
• All images should have captions and descriptive alt text. This is a detail which can be added, however.
• Many of the images used here do not have proper copyright and licensing information, and so will be deleted shortly unless this is provided. Not that commons only accepts images that are freely licensed, so that anyone may use or modify them for any purpose. This specifically means that the company's competitors could use them in ads. Has the company authorized this in published writing? If so, where?
• "The CHB-Evo. Internal Combustion Engine Family:" The article is about the company it should not be a product directory or brochure. If a product or product family is mentioned, it should be discussed in terms of how it has affected the company, increasing or decreasing profits, changing its market, growing or harming its reputation or the like. There should be enough detail to understand what the product or product family is, but not a detailed list of specifications nor properties or features. Statements about the product's reception or effect on the company should be sourced to an independent published reliable source.
• Text such as "At this connecting rod position. The combustion chambers #1 and #2 are located 90 degrees to the mid-plane of the connecting rods." might possibly belong in an article about the product, should it be notable, but definitely do not belong in an article about the company. Much the same could be said of most of this section.
• "There is no dirty air-oil mixture as is the case with regular 2-Strokes" sounds like a marketing or advertising statement, even if true, and it is not cited to a source. If independent reviewers have written about this development and considered it important, it might perhaps be mentioned in terms of their reactions or comments.
• "The NR-1 Supermileage Vehicle" much the same comments as on "CHB-Evo. Internal Combustion Engine" there is far too much detail about the product for an article about the company.

"NR-Ceramic Pistons and Cylinder Liners:" again far too much product detail.

• "In light of the CHB-Evo. Internal Combustion Engine Technology and its revolutionary materials, the company has been developing," again this is puffery. Particularly such adjectives as "revolutionary ", unless an independent source has used such a term and can be specifically quoted.
• "The company claims that they are the ONLY MANUFACTURER IN THE WORLD, who has mastered a CLEAN COMBUSTION without metal compression and oil control rings" don't shout. if this is a company claim, it should be sourced to the place where the company published that claim, and no claim should be in all caps (or bold or italic either). Have other sources reacted to this claim? if so, how? if not, it may not be worth mention.
• "According to the website and other documentation..." provide specific citations or don't mention it.
• "...the company has been developing Carbon Fiber products in light of the NR-1 body panel design..." what does "in light of" mean here? Are the designs for use in the NR-1? Or inspired by its experience with the NR-1? Or what? If the connection is worth mentioning, make it clear.
• "Next, came the all carbon-fiber Dining Room. The Dining Room encompasses a Carbon-Fiber Dining Table --seats 8--, and matching Carbon-Fiber Chair." This whole thing sounds like an entry in marketing brochure. Has such a dining room been significant to the company which is the subject of the article? if so, how? again, 3rd-party independent reliable sources should be cited.
• "Eventually, came the all carbon-fiber BATHROOM" 'eventually' like 'next' really does not belong here, and again focus on the company, not on its products and particularly not on the features of its products. Also again lose the all caps.
• References section. Currently this is just a list of web links. It does not help the reader learn which statement is supported by which reference source, nor who published each reference, nor when. Provide proper metadata for each reference (author, date, work in which published, etc) and use them in proper inline citations to support specific statements. See referencing for beginners and citing sources. Also, blogs and facebook pages are almost never acceptable as sources, see self published sources and WP:RS. Raw patent documents should generally not be used as sources, instead find a secondary source that interprets or comments on a patent.

I hope you find these comments helpful. DES ^(talk) 22:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Niama-Reisser, LLC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niama-Reisser, LLC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niama-Reisser, LLC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 21:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niama-Reisser, LLC. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine Gryphon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Alreim/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 20:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niama-Reisser (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine Gryphon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niama-Reisser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 18:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Niama-Reisser concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Niama-Reisser, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Niama-Reisser

Hello, Alreim. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Niama-Reisser".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 05:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)