Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Alexob1212. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: MONQ, LLC (December 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 00:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Alexob1212! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 00:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Substitute:Peer review edit

 Template:Substitute:Peer review has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. David Biddulph (talk) 07:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alexob1212/sandbox edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Alexob1212/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 07:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 elcome to Wikipedia Alexob1212, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia.

Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.

Policies, guidelines and peer assistance Help and Tutorials
  The five pillars of Wikipedia.
The fundamental principles of the project.
  Tutorial.
Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
  Main policies of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.
  How to start a page.
If you want to create a new article
  Style Guide.
The complete guide to how articles should look
.
  Help.
The complete help guide
  Copyright.
Addressing copyright concerns
.
  Quick reference.
A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
  Help Desk.
Here you can ask other editors for assistance
  Your user pages and your sandbox.
Editing in your own "personal" space
  Adoption program.
Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.
  Frequently asked questions.
Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by pressing   or   in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 07:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC) John from Idegon (talk) 07:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your additions to Berula edit

I have moved basically all the content you added to the Berula article out to the Berula erecta page, as it is all about this particular species rather than about the genus as a whole. It's good content, well researched and fairly decently written, but you put it in the wrong article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

PS, please take a look around WP:WikiProject Plants and join if you're interested, the project would welcome a new editor with your skills. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Substitute:Peer review edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Substitute:Peer review, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Replied to you edit

 
Hello, Alexob1212. You have new messages at Athaenara's talk page. --02:27, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Alexob1212! You created a thread called Moving new Draft to Mainspace at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply