Welcome!

edit

Hello, Alewisbowen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:St. Peter School, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! S Philbrick(Talk) 16:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:St. Peter School

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:St. Peter School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://saint-peter-school.org/about_us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Peter School (October 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 17:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Alewisbowen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 17:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest editing

edit

Hello, Alewisbowen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:St. Peter School, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alewisbowen. I've added the above template for reference based upon what you've posted at Wikipedia:Teahouse#2nd attempt at article draft - is there a submission process?. Although Wikipedia doesn't expressly prohibit conflict-of-interest editing, it does highly discourage it because it can often lead to some serious problems. Moreover, since you've identified yourself as an employee of the school and it appears you've been ask to create an article about it on its behalf, there's also a very good chance you would also be considered to be a paid editor of some kind as well which further complicates things. Technically, you're still working on a draft which means there's some wiggle room to work with, but you should carefully read through Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure to familiarize yourself with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You might also want to take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools for some general advice about creating an article about a school. I'm going to ask one of that WikiProject's moderators to see if he can give you any further advice. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Marchjuly thank you very much. I have disclosed paid editor status. I did get a submit template added to my page, but if it gets rejected again I will puruse another angle by asking a parent to create and publish the page on our behalf. I did keep very basic information on this article page about the school - there is no description language describing how great the school is - and the facts (accredidation, for example) are supported by citations so it's pretty straightfoward. So we'll see what happens. Thank you very much for your help. ALB (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
The all important point is that you are being transparent about your paid status. My recommendation is to revise the draft and resubmit to Articles for Creation. Essential you use neutral language (model it on existing private school articles) and that you find independently written articles about the school. Boston Globe? Any other? David notMD (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi again ALB. I see you added Template:Connected contributor (paid) to user page. That particuluar template, however, is something which you should add to the talk page of any article you edit for which you are being paid/compensated to edit. So, in this case, Draft talk:St. Peter School is where you want to add that template. The {{UserboxCOI}} you've added to your user page is more than sufficient per WP:PAID and WP:DECLARECOI, so you don't really need to add any more templates for that kind of thing. You can though add other content to your userpage as long as it complies with WP:UPYES.
Regarding asking a parent to create the article on behalf of the school, that is almost surely going to still be considered a WP:COI for pretty much the same reason as it would be for you to create the article. The only difference would be whether the parent would be considered to be a paid-contributor, which they probably wouldn't.
The primary reason you're draft is being declined, however, is because elementary schools are generally not considered Wikipedia notable just because they exist. Schools in general are subject to Wikipedia:Notability (companies and organizations) as explained in WP:NSCHOOL, which means they typically have to have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to be deemed notable enough for a Wikipedia article to be written about them. So, unless it can be established that your school has received such coverage, it seems unlikely that any Wikipedia article written by anyone is going to survive being nominated for deletion.
FWIW, if a Wikipedia article cannot be written about your school, don't take it as a personal insult; there are lots of really good organizations and causes which don't have articles written about them. Wikipedia role is not to promote or advocate on the behalf of subject; it's only to reflect information which has been written about in reliable sources (as defined by Wikipedia) which can be verified through citations to these sources. Moreover, even if an article about your school is accepted, nobody at the school would have any final editorial control over the content of the article; so, as long as the content is deemed to comply with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, it will stay even if it's something that the school would prefer to have removed. Many organizations find out too late that Wikipedia is not like a social media account where they have total control of the message, especially after content they would rather not have in the article gets added. Then, when they try to remove it or have someone else remove it, they finally understand how little control they really have over the article content. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:41, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Peter School (October 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Peter School (October 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
John from Idegon (talk) 15:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Peter School (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Alewisbowen! You created a thread called 2nd attempt at article draft - is there a submission process? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply