Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeo Tiong Min (May 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 09:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Abceasyas123dorayme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 09:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeo Tiong Min has been accepted

edit
 
Yeo Tiong Min, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 01:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thio Shen Yi

edit
 

The article Thio Shen Yi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article, BLP does not meet WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Thio Shen Yi" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thio Shen Yi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 17#Thio Shen Yi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. You are being notified because you created the article that was later converted into a redirect. Thanks, — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 05:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thio Shen Yi for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thio Shen Yi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thio Shen Yi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Abceasyas123dorayme! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:59, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Tan Yock Lin

edit

On 15 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tan Yock Lin, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 16:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reverts on a number of your recent edits.

edit

I have reverted three of your recent edits. Regarding Goh Yihan, it is not within the scope of Wikipedia as an encyclopaedia to record Goh's citing of Lord Denning as an influence in a lecture unless it is significant enough to constitute encyclopaedic content (see WP:WIAE). I reverted your edit on Adrian Tan due to the use of the word "legal luminaries" in citing who came to the memorial service, as that is WP:PEACOCK description of the jurists who attended. I reverted the Foo Chee Hock edit, as the use "was" in a Wikipedia article's title, in regards to biographies, is used for dead persons. When describing a former position, the term "former (position)" is preferred. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply