5anan27
Welcome! edit
|
February 2015 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Thambiluvil Sri Kannaki amman temple has been reverted.
Your edit here to Thambiluvil Sri Kannaki amman temple was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87WuiVovp1w, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yTVNsksxsw) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
5anan27, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi 5anan27! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Batticaloa Territory edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Batticaloa Territory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blackknight12 (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Batticaloa Territory, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. You must not remove speedy deletion tags from an article that you have created, even if you believe they are incorrect. In this instance, the speedy deletion tags were no longer needed, so I won't be replacing them, however you still should not have deleted them. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi 5anan27! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 08:53, Wednesday, January 27, 2016 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About Template edit
Could you please create a template about Template:Shiva temples just like Template:Vishnu temples exist. It would be really helpful, by the way you have done a great job by creating Template:Saivism.--Anandmoorti (talk) 06:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Anandmoorti, I just updated Template:Shiva temples. Please check whether it is okay or not. 
--5anan27 (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes its ok. You can also take help from Category:Shiva temples Category:Shiva temples in India List of Shiva temples in India. And also if possible try to add this template in the article related to Shiva temples like Kashi Vishwanath Temple article. I have added this template in few articles. Thanks--Anandmoorti (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Nandi (bull)
- added links pointing to Parameshwara and Agamas
- Tattva (Shaivism)
- added links pointing to Maya and Parameshwara
- Pasam (Saivism)
- added a link pointing to Maya
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kubjika, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tantric. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
New Shaiva sub-schools chart edit
Which publication of Alexis Sanderson, and page numbers, is it based on? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch:, I made the chart from the works available in his website. Particularly saying, An Introduction to Śaivism: Lecture at the University of Kyoto, December 2004. Ten-page handout. Also, I would like to tell that the chart was only modified from his works. And although the classification named others is just made by me including all other well-known Saivism sects, they were assigned there as they can't be included in either Adimargam or Mantramargam categorization. --5anan27 (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- That only partially supports the chart. A chart that shows A --- B --- C can imply A led to B, B led to C, etc. Similarly when a chart has two or more parallel limbs, it can imply that there was no overlap. All this is not what Sanderson is stating on pages 1-6. The chart needs to be redrawn, or a better source found. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- He describes Pashupata, Kalamukha and Kapalika are evolved from one by one and defines them as Adimarga I, II, III respectively in his articles (I couldn't memorize the names at the moment and could find it if I have some time). This is why I interpret them in that way. But in parallel limbs, I accept your point of view. Yes, it is impossible to tell that there are no overlaps in Saivism, an enormous religion, in which it is very difficult to distinguish even existing and extinct sub - schools. Sanderson unintentionally mentions all these sub - sects in different sources and it is difficult to point out a single reference. FYI, I drew this diagram just to give a clear overview of Saivite sects after seeing this chart with some mistakes according to Sanderson (Kapalika in Mantramarga, Lingayat from Siddhanta, etc.) Please explain me in which aspects this diagram want to be redrawn. If the "reliable single source" is the only problem, it is ok for me to remove the chart from the page. It is difficult to mention single source.
--5anan27 (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- He describes Pashupata, Kalamukha and Kapalika are evolved from one by one and defines them as Adimarga I, II, III respectively in his articles (I couldn't memorize the names at the moment and could find it if I have some time). This is why I interpret them in that way. But in parallel limbs, I accept your point of view. Yes, it is impossible to tell that there are no overlaps in Saivism, an enormous religion, in which it is very difficult to distinguish even existing and extinct sub - schools. Sanderson unintentionally mentions all these sub - sects in different sources and it is difficult to point out a single reference. FYI, I drew this diagram just to give a clear overview of Saivite sects after seeing this chart with some mistakes according to Sanderson (Kapalika in Mantramarga, Lingayat from Siddhanta, etc.) Please explain me in which aspects this diagram want to be redrawn. If the "reliable single source" is the only problem, it is ok for me to remove the chart from the page. It is difficult to mention single source.
- I will remove it. We can't combine sources to inadvertently imply new conclusions. Instead of a chart, perhaps a Venn diagram might better reflect the nature of Shaivism (or any other tradition within Indian religions). There has been a lot of sharing ideas and overlaps. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Meykandar edit
Hi, I'm Montanabw. 5anan27, thanks for creating Meykandar!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs a thorough review of grammatical structure and a copyedit
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Disambiguation link notification for October 3 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meykandar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Atman and Siva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gayatri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parameshwara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, 5anan27. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 7 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sadasiva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parameshwara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, 5anan27. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, 5anan27. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |