Your edit to Sarah Lawrence College

edit

Your recent edit to Sarah Lawrence College (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for experimenting with the page The Most Dangerous Game on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. BostonMA 15:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fordham University

edit

Please stop vandalizing pages as you did to Fordham University. You will be blocked. Scskowron 05:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do something constructive with your time. Thanks. Scskowron 23:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding edits made during February 3 2007 (UTC) to Sarah Lawrence College

edit

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 07:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not target one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NickContact/Contribs 08:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Orthologist 19:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

November 2007

edit

  If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Elisabeth Hasselbeck, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Flyer22 06:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

January 2008

edit
 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Freewinds has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 00:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to She-Ra, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Longboard (skateboard) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcQpcvkylGs) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 07:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2008

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Woodstock, Vermont. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nyttend (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Fatherland (novel) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 03:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of Sarah Lawrence College people has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. decltype 23:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Robinia pseudoacacia, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 01:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mr. Pete has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Cutno (talk) 05:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mr. Pete. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Cutno (talk) 05:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Katja Kassin. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ~ Butros (Talk) 00:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Katja Kassin. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiderolls 00:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sasha Grey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possible vandalism (Warning #1)

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Colin Farrell, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by AVBOT.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.

AVBOT produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been reverted, please make the edit again (open the link and press save), report it and remove this warning. Thank you, AVBOT (talk) 02:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010

edit

  Thank you for your contribution to File:Tempted and Tried.jpg, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely-used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Cheers, LindsayHi 12:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from United States Virgin Islands. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gina Lynn, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Laod (talk) 19:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Gaelan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Neil Breen— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (talk to) Gaelan('s contributions) 19:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Loving v. Virginia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LakesideMiners (talk) 18:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Doug Weller talk 18:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mark Bittman seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Minnesota State University, Mankato, you may be blocked from editing. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jeffrey McDaniel. Shellwood (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jeffrey McDaniel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeffrey McDaniel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Mxtt.prior. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Primary Colors (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Mxtt.prior (talk) 18:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

List of Kazakhs

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of Kazakhs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:Alopece—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:27, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Butterfly Lovers, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 17:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply