| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the You've Been Trumped article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
"Highest rated film of all time"
edit"The film was briefly ranked as the highest rated British film of all time on the Internet Movie Database"... this sentence is bullshit (and so is the sensationalist article "justifying" it). If I release a movie (or anything rateable) and the first few reviews are, for the sake of argument, 100%, then I too would be able to claim that my product was "briefly" the highest ranking product of its class of all time. It's a simply vacuous accolade! Does this pseudo-fact really belong in an encyclopaedic article, even if some dubious journalistic source did report it? Edward Grefenstette (talk) 11:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Totally agree—removed. 80.189.182.55 (talk) 20:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Don't split, rename
editIt has been suggested that section "A Dangerous Game (2014)" be split into a new article. (Discuss) Proposed since August 2015. Oppose. Keep it together, and instead rename the article to be about his extensive and controversial golf course development, which is obviously the point of these two films, and fill out the facts on that topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.158.151 (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Split
editIn response to the request to split: Someone looking for the other movie would expect information in a separate article. I say split it.
Tardisengineer (talk) 23:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Trumph sucks
edithe really does - last week tonight — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:8100:C9AE:BD53:8AB8:4025:ADF0 (talk) 22:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Review of You've Been Trumped Too in The Guardian
editThe Guardian film critic Peter Bradshaw reviewed You've Been Trumped Too.[1] There is information in there possibly worth adding. I guess this new film should have its own article. Best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 23:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Bradshaw, Peter (3 November 2016). "You've Been Trumped Too review – this is what a Trump win would look like". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2016-11-03.
Interview
editThe film-maker gave a long interview about YBT and YBTT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWewfG3dS8E Kdammers (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)