Talk:Yabu Meizan
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Yoninah in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Yabu Meizan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
( )
Bowl by Yabu Meizan
- ... that Yabu Meizan's success as a porcelain artist (work pictured) inspired a rival workshop to attach his name to their work? "One workshop actually used Yabu Meizan's name and style to sell its output, inferior to the genuine article but by no means bad, to less discerning customers who could not afford or did not appreciate the subtle colouring and attention to detail seen in true Meizan work." Earle, Joe (1999). Splendors of Meiji : treasures of imperial Japan : masterpieces from the Khalili Collection. St. Petersburg, Fla.: Broughton International Inc. p. 119. ISBN 1874780137. OCLC 42476594.
- ALT1:... that Yabu Meizan's success as a porcelain artist (work pictured) inspired a rival workshop to sell imitations under his name?
- Reviewed: The Lincoln Project
Moved to mainspace by MartinPoulter (talk). Self-nominated at 15:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC).
New enough (live on 13:53, 13 May 2020), long enough (over 2,300 chars), well sourced, neutral, passes Earwig and eye tests for non-plagarism. Hook is cited, AGF on the content, and both hooks are interesting, though ALT1's wording is better in my opinion. OTRS ticket is valid (am an agent, personally viewed ticket), image is used in the article and shows well at small size. QPQ present. AGF tick because I don't have access to some of the sources. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
