I did the first pass to try and cleanup advert-style language. It's ugly, but better than it was, I think. If someone has some good WP:RS to help flesh it out that would be great. CodeCurmudgeon (talk) 00:44, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for taking a look. I have removed most of the remaining problematic content (blatant advertising, excessive self-serving details, no independent sources to show relevance). While I usually try to preserve some notable encyclopedic bits, these parts were unsalvageable in their current form and violated almost all of Wikipedia's basic content policies (neutrality, verifiability, relevance, due weight, no advertizing, etc.). If some significant details are missing, editors with an obvious "conflict of interest" are welcome to suggest non-promotional additions based on independent reliable sources on this talkpage. GermanJoe (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
