Talk:William R. Purnell

William R. Purnell has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 1, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 16, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Rear Admiral William R. Purnell, Brigadier General Thomas F. Farrell and Captain Deak Parsons were the "Tinian Joint Chiefs" who coordinated the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States: Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Military history: Biography / Maritime / North America / United States / World War I / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:William R. Purnell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Diannaa (talk · contribs) 17:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
Copy edit revealed no major concerns with the prose.

B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
The lead is a bit too short given the size of the article. My suggestions: incorporate a bit of material on his supervision of the Manhattan Project and/or mention his awards. The other MoS criterion are met.

A. Provides references to all sources:
Article has sources for all content, all verifiable.

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
Sources are high quality books and periodicals. Spot checks reveal no copyright violations or too-close paraphrasing. Citation bot, Checklinks, and Reflinks found no issues. No technical errors were spotted in the referencing mark-up.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed:
We could use a bit of general info on why they went to Tinian please.

B. Remains focused:
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Hi Hawkeye! A nice article that only needs a couple things for a pass. The article has been placed on hold for one week. -- Diannaa (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've expanded the introduction, and the section on the Manhattan Project. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Okay good. I am passing to GA. Best wishes and congratulations, -- Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions