This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This page seems to be getting hit by some PR. Please stop doing that. Going to remove the founders section unless it's sourced/rewritten.
Beakermeep (talk) 12:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Whole thing reads like a PR fluff piece to be honest! 2.100.29.202 (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's too large and I don't see a reason for its inclusion. The table can be found here in case there is a reason it should be added back in. [1]Radiodef (talk) 03:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It is a Market Wired press release which states Waves is the source. I've been doing a little searching and I can't find any others. There are many articles covering this but they are all verbatim republishes. (See Google query for "waves fifa world cup vuvuzela".) Should the tidbit be removed or is it OK?
The ref could also be swapped for any of the others but that might obfuscate the fact that the source is actually Waves. For example Pro Sound Web covered this but it says 'by PSW Staff' and there is not an indication the text is near-unchanged.
Merely republishing a press release is probably not far-removed enough to be WP:SECONDARY.
I don't feel experienced enough to know what to think here. If somebody else feels compelled one way feel free to take appropriate action. Just wanted to bring attention to it.