Talk:Virgin Snow (album)

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Requested move 4 April 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago9 comments7 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. Consensus for the second move exists when considering the strength of arguments. feminist (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Virgin Snow → Virgin Snow (album)
Virgin Snow (film) → Virgin Snow

– Only two articles with this title, and the Korean-Japanese film from 2007 receives 97% of all page views. PC78 (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Support first, not convinced about the benefit to readers of removing (film) from a Korean film, vs virgin snow. cf Virgin Group's 1980s travel venture. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support - as WP:ONEOTHER with hatnote directing to the album from the film. Would also be just as fine with disambiguating both for a while per WP:NOPRIMARY. I think the main (non-title) use of this phrase is as the skiing term "virgin snow" (aka "virgin powder"). -- Netoholic @ 13:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm not convinced ONEOTHER applies even though there are only 2 articles. Virgin Snow (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why do you think it might not apply, can you elaborate? The redirect virgin snow has just been created and is not mentioned at the target article, per WP:DIFFCAPS I'm not convinced that it needs to be factored in. Other dab page entries (again, this page just created) don't appear to have much significance. PC78 (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Support 1st, oppose 2nd per In ictu oculi - no clear primary topic. Move disambiguation page to the basename of "Virgin Snow". Paintspot Infez (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom, with hatnote to the album. 97% of page views, per the nom, seems to cinch primary. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support both. If 97% of page views is not a clear primary topic, what is? If anyone thinks arranging titles per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC does not benefit readers, that's an argument to make at WT:D. Good luck with that. --В²C ☎ 19:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic