Talk:This Ugly yet Beautiful World
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
 | On June 2016, it was proposed that this article be moved from This Ugly Yet Beautiful World to This Ugly yet Beautiful World. The result of the discussion was Moved. |
Why is this page so spoiler-filled? edit
You assume that everybody going to this page has watched EVERY single episode. That's not fair for somebody who's just looking around for information about this anime and doesn't want to know EVERYTHING!!! Please, at least, put a spoiler warning on the page. ktanksbai --68.255.74.59 (talk) 13:03, 9 May 2009 (UTC) -I agree with this it should be edited so not to ruin the show for others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.246.228.23 (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has no spoiler warnings. 75.157.78.82 (talk) 05:11, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Review(s) edit
- ANN: v1, v2, v3, Shelf Life
- Mania.com: Collection
- popcultureshock: [1]
in the article it says "Hikari turn into her "evil" self and destroy the school" but this didn't happen it was Ioneos waking up and hikari claims that she didn't even know he was there.Shinigani (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 4 June 2016 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved per MOS:CT. (closed by a page mover) What's in your palette? Paine 07:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
This Ugly Yet Beautiful World → This Ugly yet Beautiful World – This is nothing to fight about; it's just a minor issue. Nevertheless, "yet" is the coordinating conjunction should be lowercased per either MOS:CT or Chicago manual style, which encourages lowercasing coordinating conjunctions, like this one. George Ho (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC) -- Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment (edit conflict)
As much as I agree that Wikipedia MOS and even Chicago stylings should override them, the exact titles should be used, in this case shownI agree now that what I wrote goes against the guideline. Please see discussion below. OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paineat this linkin the many links up in the suggested references box on this talk page.* It is not Wikipedia's place, neither through policy nor guideline, to make such changes to this type of article's title. This is just the type of situation where IAR should be vigorously applied.03:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)11:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
* link went dead, so this was modified at 06:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC) (Paine)
- How does the MOS:CT prevent you from improving the title, Paine? Actually, MOS:CT doesn't do harm to the title unless the "yet" debate would escalate to the "like" debacle (see archived discussion). It encourages consistent spelling or styling, something that policies lack. --George Ho (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- George, I don't mean to turn this into any kind of big debate or debacle. There are some stylings that we do change in article titles. But say an editor includes a quote from the TV series that goes something like, "One of the characters on This Ugly Yet Beatiful World is quoted to have said, 'Air, earth, fire and water – is that all there is? What about Heavy Metal?'" Now, should another editor go in and change "Yet" to "yet"? That's the series' name, and I don't think it's any kind of weird stylization that Wikipedia usually modifies. It just doesn't seem like a big enough deal to do a page rename. OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine 19:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- No, no, no. I don't blame you, Paine. I respect your vote honestly and your original statement. I also think it is not much of a big deal as I made every preposition and conjunction out to be. I kinda grew out of such debacles on capitalization and stuff. However, I wouldn't take sources seriously; they have their own style, and we have ours. By the way, you might want to take a look at Talk:Alone yet Not Alone and Talk:So Near and yet So Far, which I did those. The latter was renamed, though one person opposed it. George Ho (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, George, in addition to your opinion, I also very much respect that of SMcCandlish, who agreed with you at Talk:Alone yet Not Alone. For the sake of consistency and adherence to the MOS guideline, I see that I was very much POV above, so... I must turn myself around on the issue of this page rename. Damn! I really don't like to change my mind; however, I've held this up too long, and if no one else has come along within the next few hours I'll rename the page myself. What's in your palette? Paine 11:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- No, no, no. I don't blame you, Paine. I respect your vote honestly and your original statement. I also think it is not much of a big deal as I made every preposition and conjunction out to be. I kinda grew out of such debacles on capitalization and stuff. However, I wouldn't take sources seriously; they have their own style, and we have ours. By the way, you might want to take a look at Talk:Alone yet Not Alone and Talk:So Near and yet So Far, which I did those. The latter was renamed, though one person opposed it. George Ho (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- George, I don't mean to turn this into any kind of big debate or debacle. There are some stylings that we do change in article titles. But say an editor includes a quote from the TV series that goes something like, "One of the characters on This Ugly Yet Beatiful World is quoted to have said, 'Air, earth, fire and water – is that all there is? What about Heavy Metal?'" Now, should another editor go in and change "Yet" to "yet"? That's the series' name, and I don't think it's any kind of weird stylization that Wikipedia usually modifies. It just doesn't seem like a big enough deal to do a page rename. OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine 19:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- How does the MOS:CT prevent you from improving the title, Paine? Actually, MOS:CT doesn't do harm to the title unless the "yet" debate would escalate to the "like" debacle (see archived discussion). It encourages consistent spelling or styling, something that policies lack. --George Ho (talk) 18:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on This Ugly Yet Beautiful World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080221150420/http://www.gainax.co.jp:80/anime/konomini/ to http://www.gainax.co.jp/anime/konomini/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine 03:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Episode summaries edit
Hello,
I've added a proper episode list to this article based on the one in the Japanese Wikipedia. In doing so, I noticed the original episode summaries weren't entirely correct and needed a little copy-editing, so I opted to leave them out (commented out). If anyone is up for writing new summaries, you can use the old ones as a basis. The official website also has some information on each episode -- it's in Japanese, however.