Talk:The Day Tokyo-3 Stood Still
Latest comment: 20 days ago by TechnoSquirrel69 in topic About the unreliable sources tag
 | The Day Tokyo-3 Stood Still has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 23, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Day Tokyo-3 Stood Still/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 15:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I'll be reviewing this article. It looks pretty good and since it's weekend and I might place comments today.Tintor2 (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comments
- Maybe a commentary from the image might add further importance to this key scene. You described this in the production section
- Misato and Kaji are not introduced. Wasn't Misato Commander?
- Maybe mention the fact that the three Evas are also mechas?
- "Critic Dani Cavallaro noted how the staff made use of both "sophisticated CGI" for the depiction of Matarael and "traditional anime camera work" for the scenes depicting the Nerv pilots, in order "to consolidate technically the adventure's pervasive mood"" Wouldn't this be more appropiate in reception?
- Introduce Sadamoto.
- The second paragraph of reception is kinda big. Maybe you might wanna separate commentary from the plot from commentary from the animation?
That's all. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: Tried my best. Sorry for the delay, but the article's TP didn't show comments and I didn't read them until I opened the direct link two hours ago.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Passed the review. Also added to Good article's television section.Tintor2 (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
About the unreliable sources tag
editDani Cavallaro's publications have been designated as generally unreliable sources in this discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard. Citations to her work can be replaced with more high-quality ones or removed, and the tag can be taken off once complete. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)