Talk:Suprobhat Bangladesh

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PROD challenge

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I am challenging the PROD rationale, it is a notable secondary newspaper of Bangladesh. We have an essay WP:INDAFD. It is mainly written for Indian articles, but, applicable here too. Also note, the article was created by a sock, which might be a reason to delete. But, PROD contested. You may wish to take it to AFD. --Tito☸Dutta 22:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC) @Jackmcbarn: Tito☸Dutta 22:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Though it might be notable, as it stands now, it doesn't appear notable. If that can be fixed, the article can be kept. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Jackmcbarn:, you should not nominate an article for deletion (specially when your concern is "notability") only on the basis of condition of the current version. Consider following WP:BEFORE. I don't think I am going to make much change in the article. I'll try to show it passes #1, #2, #4 of Newspaper notability requirements. And that is more an AFD argument. But, if you take it to AFD, actually I have to repeat my arguments there. --Tito☸Dutta 23:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you think you can make it meet those criteria, go ahead and remove the PROD and do so. I'll check back in a few days to see if it still merits deletion, and if so, I'll AfD it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

@Jackmcbarn: yes, you are right, actually I should have removed the template. But, I generally prefer removing templates myself and allow others to discuss. . --Tito☸Dutta 23:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic