Talk:Standing in the Dark (album)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by SSTflyer in topic Requested move 22 May 2016

Requested move 22 May 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus supports the move, and I am the only one who is opposing here. SSTflyer 07:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply



– While I do admit that the Lawson song is much more popular than this album, I think there is no main page for "Standing in the Dark" in this case. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:8429:C63A:38F:4E3E (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Support no primary satisfying both requirements here. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose no evidence has been presented why the album is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. Long-term significance is an important aspect. SSTflyer 15:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - and I would also support the song becoming primary. The album did come first but it's got zero notability, since there's no chart info and the only reference is to a review on Allmusic. Unreal7 (talk) 10:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support There isn't always a primary topic, and this is a case of that. Make this the diambiguation and move all other pages to a disambiguated title. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.