St Mabyn Parish Church is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I think the present placement of most of the images is unsatisfactory because, at least in my version of the display, the lead is reduced to a column about two or three words wide. The manual of style for images says "However, avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other, or between an image and infobox, navigation template, or similar." On the version I edited this was avoided and the images on the right below the infobox were slightly less than the length of the rest of the article and the lead was displayed normally.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hmm I wonder what you are viewing it on? My display gives me at least 27 words between the images. I suppose as a compromise we could add a gallery and move trhe images to that? Theroadislong (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
I only have a basic pc but it has a screen 16" wide. I think I was making the narrowness worse since I use a 125% zoom level when editing. I would still advocate a format without channelling of the lead. I see you have already done a version with a gallery which I would now prefer to one of the other versions; the images were taking up a large proportion of the space when they accompanied the text.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
