Talk:Somayeh Mohammadi

Latest comment: 4 years ago by WereSpielChequers in topic while in was asking them

Reverting RS

edit

@Stefka Bulgaria, The article has deletion tag but removing sources to show that the subject is not notable is not a good idea. Iranian sources such a Tasnim, irinn to state Iran's position are reliable. It was said to you before! why isn't Tirana Times a weekly newspaper reliable? All of sources u removed were supported by another source. In other hands, according to WP:RS, Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources... mainly on RSes does not mean that all the sources have to be Rs, However, in this article it is.Saff V. (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Tasnimnews, irinn.ir, and other sources related to the IRI are not reliable sources for this article. I will remove them and the statements they support based on that they don't meet WP:RS Alex-h (talk) 16:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
As Icewhiz explained, "Tasnim (as well as other Iranian agencies) can indeed be used to represent IRI views". So they are reliable to show Iran position. Be careful and Don't remove them.Saff V. (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Efforts to get her out" vs "Background"

edit

The title "Efforts to get her out", when according to her own accord she is not held there against her will, is an innacurate way of describing the circumstances. For this reason, I think that changing the title to "Background" is an improvement. 122.155.9.26 (talk) 20:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Reverts without explanation

edit

I tried to make a series of improvements to this articles, but they were reverted by LissanX without explanation. I provided my explanations for each edit in my edit summaries. If they need more discussion, we can discuss here, but please do not revert without any explanation. 122.155.9.26 (talk) 07:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

while in was asking them

edit

I have read " a letter was sent by Somayeh to Canadian authorities while in was asking them to return her to Canada again, as soon as possible" twice, and I think it would make sense if I removed "while in was" but I don't know if that would be the sense that anyone actually wants....... ϢereSpielChequers 19:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply