Talk:Smithfield Packing Company

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Klosterdev in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

I've removed the phrase:

"the company retains its family heritage"

as this is vague and somewhat meaningless. In what sense has a fortune 500 company "retained its family heritage"? --163.1.176.68 18:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Information about labor rights abuses was deleted, as was a link to the Union's site. These possible Astroturf edits have been reverted. Delirium of disorder 16:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

There should be some mention of the controversy surrounding Smithfields business practices (i.e. the ones here http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12840743/porks_dirty_secret_the_nations_top_hog_producer_is_also_one_of_americas_worst_polluters) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.63.247.2 (talk) 14:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article got taken down, but someone reposted it [1]. Can we integrate this into the article somehow? There's a flurry of information about the lagoons of pig crap and such that Smithfield has caused. klosterdev (talk) 00:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 23:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply