Talk:Sinopec

"Largest" company status"

There appears to be some disagreement between this article and the one for Walmart over which is the largest company in the world by revenue. Neither claim has an obvious source cited and I don't trust myself to fix this on my own. Wanted to bring it to someone's attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinsukato (talk • contribs) 15:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

POV

I have re-ordered the article to match the format of other energy company articles, such as that of Royal Dutch Shell, PetroChina, ExxonMobil, and British Petroleum--corporate history first, an economic profile, then a discussion of recent events.

Upon researching the Gabon article using a more recent source, AfricaFiles, I have found that Sinopec has rectified its earlier activities in Loango, and in order to properly note that Sinopec has, in fact, expanded its activities in Gabon and improved its relationship with local environmental organizations and the government, I have edited the 'Sinopec in Africa' section..129.173.136.98 14:10, 12 Jan 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.115.168.245 (talk)

I have returned deleted pars and references to the 'Sinopec in Africa' section, removed by user stephenzhu, and retitled the section to reflect its current content which is now wider than 'criticism of Sinopec' as it covers the recent kidnapping of Sinopec employees.

Feel free to remove my revisions, or change them in any way but I ask that you justify any similar wholesale editing so that I won't come back and revert the changes. All reasonable edits get my support.Xue hanyu 14:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)xue_hanyu

Wo this page has been kidnapped by negative POV! Need help immediately! 129.173.136.98 19:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

April 4, 2010

I stumbled across this page when trying to figure out the ownership structure of one of this company's subsidiaries. I don't believe that it maintains a neutral point of view in its history section, as the section mainly discusses what seems to be a single editor's concerns with the the environmental track record of the company. As I am no expert on this company or its organizational history, I will leave it to those better informed to better flesh out the history section. However, I do believe that the information regarding the company's actions in Gabon should at least be moved to the section regarding the company's environmental track record. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.217.3.52 (talk) 19:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

WSJ resource

• Sinopec Deepens China's Push Into Canadian Oil Patch by Edward Welsch October 10, 2011; In July, Cnooc Ltd. agreed to pay just over $2 billion for bankrupt OPTI Canada Inc., regarding Daylight Energy Ltd. 99.190.85.209 (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

CNOOC Ltd.. 99.190.87.127 (talk) 07:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Politics of the People's Republic of China potential resource

• China Versus Shareholders "Sinopec's Unsolicited Offer to Test Limit of Beijing's Influence." 14.December.2011 97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Merge with China Petrochemical Corporation

This page China_Petrochemical_Corporation refers to the same organization. Federicotg (talk) 18:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sinopec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131005020527/http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/world-news/sinopec-makes-c3622bn-bid-for-canada%60s-daylight_596261.html to http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/world-news/sinopec-makes-c3622bn-bid-for-canada%60s-daylight_596261.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sinopec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110917005942/http://english.sinopec.com/about_sinopec/our_company/chairman_address/ to http://english.sinopec.com/about_sinopec/our_company/chairman_address/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005013823/http://english.gov.cn/2007-01/04/content_486582.htm to http://english.gov.cn/2007-01/04/content_486582.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)