This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
It has been brought up that the introduction of the article lists positives for the company that all cite the company's official website, which may be an indication of bias. I'm going to flag this article for potential bias, until the article is improved, and cites more neutral sources. Ozhu (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
The company's webpage is primarily used for sales figures and the like. Some would say being large is a positive, others a negative, personally I see being big as neutral. In any case, I'll switch out some of the sourcing. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have added several more sources. If concerns remain, please let me know which statements specifically you find problematic (merely using the company's website does not equate with bias and is a common practice). --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Cool, the article is much more neutral than it was a couple days ago. Ozhu (talk) 05:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
The addition of the "analyst Derek Scissors" without citing his firm is troubling. AEI is a think tank that prioritizes free enterprise, with a focus on international trade. They are funded almost entirely by donations associated with the Republican party. This statement wouldn't be without a counter in most forums. There are certainly items in this article that stress the geopolitical implications of the transaction, and not in ways that Scissors would have us believe. https://www.revealnews.org/article/how-china-purchased-a-prime-cut-of-americas-pork-industry/208.251.187.170 (talk) 15:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As noted in the article, the company changed its name to WH Group in 2014. Can someone please retitle this article as WH Group, with Shuanghui redirecting here? I don't know how to do that. RCTodd (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
