 | Shin Megami Tensei If... has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 16, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Untitled edit
Can someone please post whether or not there was an English translation for this game, and if so, the date?
- No. --Sfida 15:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
This article is awful. Someone needs to re-write it. --Sfida 15:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Info about a manga of if... edit
Apparently there was a one shot manga of this game. Anyone know more about it? This is the only conclusive record I could find (and it's not much :( ): http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/manga.php?id=8489EditingMachine 07:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
If any1one wants to play the game there is a walkthru/translation/faq at gamefaqs.com edit
The bad news are:the only way to find the game is at a pawn shop or a ROM(both could be illegal) I also noticed other faqs like that on gamefaqs and this is no freakin' ad.
"What If" citation edit
The text "The game concerns a "what if" situation in which Tokyo did not get destroyed in the first Shin Megami Tensei." should be removed, as this is not actually mentioned within the game and is merely speculation on the part of a reviewer. It's a common misconception being propagated by people reading this article, since the game itself hasn't been translated. Unless a proper citation for that claim can be found (e.g., a quote from a developer of the game, a manual, or something else officially produced by ATLUS), then it should be removed to avoid furthering spreading potential misinformation.
--66.186.65.35 (talk) 12:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Shin Megami Tensei If.../GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 11:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
@IDV: Some suggestions:
- Can the reception and legacy sections be merged? The two are relatively short; the reception section in particular is only one paragraph long.
Done
- And speaking of reception, are there any sales figures for the game?
- Being an old Japanese-only Super Famicom game, this would be difficult without access to Japanese video game magazines from the time. If you can find any reliable sources mentioning the sales, I'd be happy to add the information.
- There a few minor typos in the plot section. Can these be fixed?
- Done
At this point, I would fail this for the reasons above, but I'm giving IDV the benefit of the doubt and giving them a week to address the issues. Just a little more work and this will be a pass. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: I have addressed the issues you brought up. For the future, I believe these are way too minor to considering immediately failing a review.--IDVtalk 11:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)