Talk:Shawna Robinson

Latest comment: 8 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
Good articleShawna Robinson has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 30, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 10, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1988, Shawna Robinson became the first female racing driver to win a NASCAR-sanctioned race?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 30, 2017.

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Shawna Robinson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    "and made her début in the Winston Cup Series (now the Sprint Cup Series)" - no accented 'e' in American English
    removed MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
    "Robinson was born on November 30, 1964 in Des Moines, Iowa" - needs a couple of links
      Done MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
    "She and her siblings, were taught that they were allowed to do anything" - unnecessary comma
    removed MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Once again another excellent article. If you plan on taking this to FAC then I would recommend adding some images if possible. I read through the whole thing and checked most of the references I could access, but couldn't find any issues so I'll pass this outright. Well done!   JAGUAR  18:53, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply