Talk:Serenity (actress)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Larry Miller (entertainer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Nikki Randall (entertainer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 15 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOVED as requested. Hadal (talk) 17:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

---

Serenity (pornographic actress) → Serenity (actress) – This redirect should be the other way around for the same reason as this. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 22:42, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose as previous RMs consensus. Also revert any undiscussed moves in category In ictu oculi (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
• Support per nom and WP:CONCISE. -- Calidum 03:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
• Support per nom and WP:CONCISE. The argument that pornographic actresses should be treated differently from other actresses simply looks like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 12:11, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Or looks like follow the category. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

• Support per nom and WP:CONCISE. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 01:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

The reading of WP:CONCISE in the nomination, and other pornstar biography RMs current is novel. Note that for example Exhalation (story) redirects to Exhalation (short story) and so on. WP:CONCISE refers to the title not the dab, and we do not clip (dabs) simply to make them short when that is the category. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose as per WP:PRECISE. There is good opportunity here to present a clear view of the valid form of work that she does. GregKaye 21:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
• Support no dab needed per WP:PRECISE, same as Aja and Savannah. --Cavarrone 09:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose. "Actress" is one who acts, right? But does a "pornographic actress" act? --Richhoncho (talk) 12:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: To paraphrase an old joke, we've already established what she is; now we're just discussing the genre. If she's not a (former) actress, then "pornographic actress" is just as incorrect as "actress" unmodified. Either all porn categories and dabs should have actor/actress removed - perhaps replaced by "performer" - or the qualifier "pornographic" should be removed from dabs unless needed as a distinguisher. 2600:1006:B16F:48A2:14E8:C473:9B00:7111 (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Even if she did not "act" that would at most be a case for calling her a bad actress not that she was not an actress. Also, if we did go by the distinction that she was not a actress we could not use pornogtaphic actress either since we would still be calling her an actress.--67.68.209.200 (talk) 18:01, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
• Support: per my comment above, on the belief that rebuilding the entire category hierarchy is unlikely to happen. 2600:1006:B16F:48A2:14E8:C473:9B00:7111 (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

(actress)/(pornographic actress) RfC

An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 30 external links on Serenity (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rogreviews.com/interviews/SERENITY.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avn.com/html/avn/news/nws/news1856.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/features/sex_on_the_wild_side.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/inner/iv0701_02.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/bone/by0502_03.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/bone/by1102_05.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/cover/otc0102_04.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.xcitement.com/serenity.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://avn.com/html/avn/archives/99_08/loose/loose0899.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avn.com/html/avn/archives/99_09/bone/by0999_02.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avn.com/html/avn/archives/99_11/bone/by1199_02.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avn.com/ng/query.cgi?act=detail&in=news&eid=5921
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/loose/loose1200.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avn.com/html/avn/news/nws/news1175.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adultvideonews.com/bone/by0901_18.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://avn.digitalod.com/query/?for=news&eid=9632
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wickedweb.com/WICKED/NEWS/Front30.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://wickedweb.com/WICKED/NEWS/97nom.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wickedweb.com/WICKED/NEWS/98nom.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avn.com/awards/noms.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avnawards.com/nominees.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avn.com/avn2001awardswinners.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://avn.digitalod.com/query/?for=news&eid=9762
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wickedweb.com/WICKED/NEWS/Front43.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://nightmovesusa.com/awards-show/past-winner-history.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nightmovesusa.com/vote/national_ballot.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://nightmovesusa.com/vote/national_ballot2002.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wickedweb.com/WICKED/NEWS/News3.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://stunningcurves.com/article1067.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://avn.digitalod.com/query/index.cgi?eid=10343&for=news

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)