Talk:Sebaceous adenitis

This article needs attention from an expert on the subject.

Newly created, could use some photos and someone to explain diagnosis. Keetanii (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Nice job

Great job on the article! I added it to the scope of the dog and vet med projects and moved it to a title that conforms to the Manual of Style :)

Do you think the skin image should be included, considering it's a diagram of human skin? — anndelion ※ 00:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Anndelion! I put the picture in even though it is of human skin because 1. there were no diagrams of dog skin available and I find finding ones with the correct licencing rather difficult, 2. it shows where in the skin sebaceous glands are found, 3. the basic skin anatomy are very similar. http://www.vetwest.com.au/skin-deep-issue-so-whats-difference-between-canine-and-human-skin [Access date 21/april/2011]. It would be great to find some photos of dogs with the condition (both long coat and short coat) and perhaps even at different stages. I found one rather ordinary photo on Flickr of a poodle with SA (wearing a tshirt) but it was (c). :) Keetanii (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Ahh, got it. Makes sense to me -- I'll keep an eye out for possible pictures to include. — anndelion ※ 07:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

External Links

What is the problem exactly with the External links? They werent for citing the information in the article, I only put them there for a list of places that extra information might be found for people looking for further information. Was that wrong? If so, feel free to remove the external links. (although I liked the dog skin vs human skin one for showing that as far as the sebaceous glands are concerned the anatomical positioning is the same) Cheer, Keetanii (talk) 23:12, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

No, I don't see anything wrong with them -- they don't even need access dates. As long as they're reputable and contain relevant information beyond what the article provides, they're fine. Cite tags really shouldn't be used in that section anyway, so I'm not sure why they were added. Maybe leave a message on the editor's talk page? — anndelion ※ 23:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Not to worry, it was just someone going through pages running bots. I'm glad the article faired so well HAHA. I've fixed the one issue it found and removed the citation error template it placed on the external links section, since nothing currently in the external links section is referencing anything in the text. If those links end up suffering from link rot it will not harm the article in the slightest. The date accessed was already placed on all those links as a precaution for link rot. Thats the problem with bots...they have no actual intelligence! Keetanii (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sebaceous adenitis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110605062817/http://www.upei.ca/~cidd/Diseases/dermatology/sebaceous%20adenitis.htm to http://www.upei.ca/~cidd/Diseases/dermatology/sebaceous%20adenitis.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)