| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SS Batavier II (1897) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | SS Batavier II (1897) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 26, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Batavier II and Batavier V, of the Dutch Batavier Line, were captured, released, and later sunk by four different submarines? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:SS Batavier II (1897)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Below is the review of my article:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Lead says upto 300 passengers could be carried. The main text raises this number to 321. Please remove the discrepancy.
- I change the lead to say that the ship could carry about 320 passengers. — Bellhalla (talk) 23:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have put the exact figure in the lead. I find it better. - DSachan (talk) 10:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Lead says upto 300 passengers could be carried. The main text raises this number to 321. Please remove the discrepancy.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Thanks - DSachan (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for yet another review! — Bellhalla (talk) 23:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)