Talk:Rupununi

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

---

• Rupununi → Rupununi River
• Rupununi savannah → Rupununi (region)

– The 'Rupununi' article contains information on both the Rupununi River (a major river in Guyana) and the Rupununi region which is a geographical region of Guyana (and was, prior to the 1980 administrative reforms an administrative region as well). These two things should be separate. Rupununi savannah (which is a distinct eco-region within the Rupununi region) should then be merged into the 'Rupununi (region)' article, once it is created. 'Rupununi River' currently exists as a redirect to the 'Rupununi' article, so the redirect needs to be removed in order for the Rupununi River article to be created. Lorelei (talk) 17:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose I understand what you're trying to do, but that's not necessary. The redirect Rupununi River doesn't need to be deleted for an article on the river to be created. Just click Rupununi River and edit. Anyone can do it. Is the river not in the Rupununi region? Unless they're in separate places, it's appropriate for this to remain an article on the region with separate articles on the river and the savannah. --BDD (talk) 05:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rupununi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/28705053

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Terrible map!

The map that supposedly shows us where the Rupununi River is in Guyana is terrible!

After you search all over the map you finally find the label "Rupununi" on the lower left of the highlighted (darkened) region. But then it is impossible to tell where the rest of it is, since the labels are entirely unclear.50.205.142.50 (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)