Talk:Robert Michael Forde

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Trypanosoma parasites in blood

• ... that Robert Michael Forde made the first definitive observation of the causes (Trypanosoma parasites pictured) of sleeping sickness in human beings?
  • ALT1:... that Robert Michael Forde made the first definitive observation of the cause of sleeping sickness (Trypanosoma parasites pictured) in human beings?

• Reviewed: African giant shrew
• 5x expanded from 3 July.

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 11:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC).

• The article needs to cite the specific page(s) of the Baker 1995 article (I assume p. 5 for the sentence corresponding to the hook). The hook probably also needs a small rewrite, because it's currently ambiguous and might imply that Forde discovered that they were the causes of sleeping sickness, which seems to be incorrect according to the sources. I would suggest something like, "... that Robert Michael Forde made the first observation of Trypanosoma parasites (pictured), the causes of sleeping sickness, in human beings?" Otherwise this seems good: Created (and expanded) within 7 days of nomination and article is long enough and adequately sourced. I corrected some small issues with style. The image is PD and good quality. No issues on Earwig. —Nizolan ^(talk) 00:18, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

@Nizolan: Alt1 added as suggested. Ref has also been done. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

@Nizolan: Will you be able to finish the review? SL93 (talk) 22:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@Philafrenzy: I was about to approve this hook, but the part that seems to discuss the hook fact (the one which mentions Kelly) lacks the necessary footnote (which instead is found in the subsequent sentence). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, fixed. You know there is no objection to just fixing such things yourself if you wish. Philafrenzy (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ALT1 approved, everything checks out. Thanks for another great article! – Levivich 15:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)