Talk:Philipp Haastrup

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Philipp Haastrup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100921231530/http://www.vi.nl:80/Spelers/Speler/Philip-Haastrup.htm to http://www.vi.nl/Spelers/Speler/Philip-Haastrup.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

CITEBUNDLE

"Sometimes the article is more readable if multiple citations are bundled into a single footnote" - I don't think that applies here. GiantSnowman 09:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes it does. It applies whenever citation numbers intrude into the readability of the text. ^[1][2] is obtrusive. You would never see it in a book; why accept it in Wikipedia? Emeraude (talk) 11:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but it's literally everywhere. That's why it says "sometimes". GiantSnowman 15:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Nothing to with OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The article is more readable if the citations are bundled and there is no reason for them not to be (e.g. where refs are reused in an article). Emeraude (talk) 07:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Disagree. GiantSnowman 08:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Well I know that. Emeraude (talk) 09:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)