Talk:Pero Budmani

Latest comment: 4 years ago by OyMosby in topic Sources

Untitled edit

Péter, szlávista, született Raguzában 1835 okt. 28. Tanult Bécsben, 1870. a raguzai gimnázium tanára lett, 1883. pedig a zágrábi akadémia által szerkesztett horvát-szerb szótár szerkesztőségébe hitták meg. Munkái: Grammatica della lingua serbo-croata (Bécs 1866-67); O. postanku slova ? u slavjanskijem jezicima (Raguza 1873-1874); Jo? nje?to o na?oj narodnoj metrici (u. o. 1875-76); Dubrovacki dijalektat kako se sada govori (Zágráb 1883); Pogled na istoriju na?e gramatike i leksikagrafije (1885); Rjecnik hravatskoga ili srpskoga jezika (Zágráb 1884-90), és egy orosz nyelvtan (u. o. 1888).

Sources edit

@OyMosby: Sources like Croatian encyclopedia or local news are not RS for something as someone's ethnic background, plus half of the sources presented are dead link and not available. They are not RS because they are most probably partisan sources, even more so because Budmani is a Serb-Catholic which is a bit controversial topic in Croatia. I would suggest that you revert yourself. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 00:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I can understand the encyclopedia, but the the news article you removed was the sole source labeling him Serb-Catholic. Also, you added two Serbian sources. Would those not be likely partisan? Are there any non-Balkan sources such as the book I cited? OyMosby (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Why did you undo my linking to the proper article? You linked back to a sports article??OyMosby (talk) 00:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Slobodna Dalmacija article does not state that he was of Croatian origin. That is nowhere to found, in the same article which has the sole purpose of refuting that any Catholic-Serbs were ever "really" Serbs, but presenting them as some sort of political construct which was made in a Belgrade laboratory. That's utterly pitiful on so many levels and that's, alas, why it's not RS. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 18:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I see what you mean, going further into the source, looks completely biased to me. Was matching the source to what it was originally before the link got corrupted. OyMosby (talk) 18:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply