Talk:Payam Akhavan

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Isingness in topic COI discussion

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Payam Akhavan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Very promotional, badly needs editing edit

It is hard to believe this page has remained in this manner for this long. It badly needs review. Isingness (talk) 04:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

COI discussion edit

I am opening a discussion here regarding the recent attempts of a new SPA to re-add a promotional biography over this entry. It would be preferable to discuss any new attempts to add puffery here first, and provide information to any interested parties that may be confused about what can or cannot go onto Wikipedia. Isingness (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

In order to provide a base perspective on potential undisclosed COI here: There are details in the text that was attempted by a recent user that do not appear in the actual sources, adding flourishes or explanations that don't occur in the sources used. This is something that only someone with a COI is likely to do, as they have access to said details. The timing is also suspicious, as early May is when many professors hire their Research Assistants to do various busy work for them, or professors themselves have more time following finals. So the time of year, plus the added details that aren't in the sources, plus the user name "Pluralism123" which is thematic of the McGill Law program (where the page subject works), plus their arrival within months of the prior hagiography's removal, plus the lack of significant edits anywhere else for that account, in addition to the user's removal of COI notices from their talk page (and the attempted removal of their conversation with me regarding COI from my own talk page oddly enough)--this makes me very concerned that someone is trying to avoid the site's Terms of Use. It would be best if any COI were revealed here so that we can move forward properly. Isingness (talk) 15:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Another McGill University IP address has tried to remove the maintenance tags from the page without adjusting the page, about the same time as last year. Any help keeping an eye on the page would be appreciated. Isingness (talk) 05:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply