Talk:Pamela Nash
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POV "only"
editRE: [1] Who is The Private Eye? Do they meet WP:RS standards? What exactly is the context of the source? Why would wikipedia state the pov opinion in our voice? Way too many unanswered questions to leave in an article about a living person. Active Banana (bananaphone 15:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- And if the source is this Private_Eye, as a satirical magazine, its POV and commentary is certainly not acceptable. Active Banana (bananaphone
More concerns about possible POV issue
editIs it me or is a substantial amount of this article simply a series of criticisms of Ms Nash, presumably by a constituent with unrealistic expectations? There is an awful lot of emphasis on her expenses, which seem rather average to me and although I can appreciate there are grievances about her performance, it does not seem unusual for a new backbencher to speak little in parliament when they have not even been an MP for a year. I'm not going to charge in and remove all of this information as I don't have much context about her but I am concerned about the general quality and neutrality of the material in this article. Thanks, Fieldday-sunday (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on Pamela Nash
editCyberbot II has detected links on Pamela Nash which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/scottish-government-save-shotts-police-station?share_id=HHEJvbaJhL
- Triggered by
\bchange\.org\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
- https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/police-scotland-keep-airdrie-police-station-open-to-the-public?share_id=bUQypIUgBI
- Triggered by
\bchange\.org\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pamela Nash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121005064249/http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-04416.pdf to http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-04416.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100916211748/http://www.davidmiliband.net:80/2010/09/13/were-campaigning-for-every-vote/ to http://www.davidmiliband.net/2010/09/13/were-campaigning-for-every-vote/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)