Talk:Osman Đikić

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Sadko in topic Lead

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Osman Đikić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

@OyMosby: Please read the article. His ethnicity is notable for the lead as the man was a notable Serb Muslim and has devoted his entire life and work to Serbdom. It's a textbook example of such notability and the exception of the general rule which should be otherwise respected. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 03:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Sadko: I made my edit after reading the article. I am also very much aware to special cases for the WP:ETHNICITY rule. I did not just blindly edit the intro. While he is indeed an ethnic Serb from Bosnia and a notable figure hence the article existing, and was a supporter of Serbian nationalism, it seemed he was more notable for his writings such as poems and such works. His political aspects seemed secondary no? If it were the reverse then yes I would see your point that his religion and ethnicity played a major role in his notability. Would you say his dedication to Serbdom overshadow his literary work (which seemed to deal more with his faith rather than ethnicity) ? (Not a trick question just asking your take on it).OyMosby (talk) 03:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
I think that both elements are equally important. Sadkσ (talk is cheap)
Was reading into the sources. I think I see your point. Would it make sense to mention both his Serb heritage and Muslim faith as both seemed to motivate his politics and literary works? OyMosby (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
It makes sense, good suggestion. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 17:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Made the change. Please see if it looks worded correctly. Wasn’t totally sure. Cheers. OyMosby (talk) 17:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's fine, thank you. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 18:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply