Talk:One Foot in the Grave

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on One Foot in the Grave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150703020600/http://www.bfi.org.uk/features/tv/100/list/list.php to http://www.bfi.org.uk/features/tv/100/list/list.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150527023354/http://archive.bournemouthecho.co.uk/2005/7/6/54266.html to http://archive.bournemouthecho.co.uk/2005/7/6/54266.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110811173220/http://archive.thenorthernecho.co.uk/2000/11/23/186162.html to http://archive.thenorthernecho.co.uk/2000/11/23/186162.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080507014422/http://www.independent.co.uk:80/opinion/commentators/the-real-victor-meldrew-would-have-had-no-time-for-this-new-social-group-641160.html to http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/the-real-victor-meldrew-would-have-had-no-time-for-this-new-social-group-641160.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080316062451/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/drama/faces/richard_wilson.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/faces/richard_wilson.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

"The programmes invariably deal with Meldrew's battle against the problems he creates for himself."

Not actually true, is it? Victor, by and large, doesn't create the problems, he just reacts to them, sometimes (but by no means always) making them worse - but thinking he "invariably" or even usually creates them is a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of the show's premise. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Agreed! Would someone like to remove that please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.2.27 (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

I've been rewatching this over the last few weeks and the OP may have a point. Many of the incidents and storylines are actually caused by Victor, often unwittingly. Most examples of other people behaving badly towards him are due to how he has behaved or spoken to them, and how they get retribution against him.

Misunderstandings are often caused by either Victor or Margaret making a small error (ordering a toy car instead of a taxi, mistaking the expensive wine bottle for their own gift, being followed by Donkeys because of the poor choice in aftershave to name but a few examples).

What is in no doubt is the brilliance of the writing! 90.249.136.231 (talk) 06:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• BBC.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

One Foot in the Grave

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Fails GA criterion 2, as outlined below. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

GA from 2006, reassessed in 2009. I notice a lot of unsourced and/or poorly sourced content (IMDB, etc) and possibly a lot of cruft. It also doesn't follow WP:MOSTV in some sections. I'd be happy to help save the article, though I might not help much for sourcing as some sources may be region-locked. Spinixster (chat!) 07:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

In casting light on some of the darker undertones within this show, can the following be changed, from:

'Due to the series' popularity, people who constantly complain and are irritated by minor things are often compared to Victor Meldrew by the British media", to read:

'Due to the series' popularity and undertones of ageism, older people that complain - and that have every right to do so - are often sidelined by being compared to Victor Meldrew'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.153.126 (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)