Talk:Oliver Edwards

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Historical Perspective in topic GA Review
Good articleOliver Edwards has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Oliver Edwards/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Is the name of the company in England really Gardner Machine and Gun Company?
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Thanks for this. According to his write-up in the Biographical Review of Hancock County, yes, the company was called the Gardner Machine and Gun Company. I have not been able to find another source that actually names his company. Historical Perspective (talk) 22:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply