Talk:Oishinbo

Reception links

I note that Oishinbo is discussed in this scholarly article. In case someone wants to start incorporating it into a stub of a reception section. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

About.com: Comic-Con 2010 Best/Worst Manga

Also, the English edition was up for a 2010 Eisner Award: final ballot. —Quasirandom (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

• GNR: Fish, sushi & sashimi vol.

--KrebMarkt (talk) 15:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Criticism

No criticism section? I would have thought there would be a section about how additives and pesticides are described unfairly... --Kjoonlee 07:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

• Are there reliable sources that discuss these matters? Unless a secondary source does so... WhisperToMe (talk) 07:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

"Censorship" section

I have edited the title of the section formerly titled "Censorship" to "Controversy". The word censorship implies that there was a formal attempt by the government or otherwise to censor the manga. (There was a lot of criticism, as is stated with sources in the text, but that is not the same as censorship.) Since the publishers claim that this was a scheduled break, a more neutral title seems more appropriate. --Epsilonpilot (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oishinbo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5msLIPidX to http://comics.shogakukan.co.jp/mangasho/rist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)