Talk:O ewiges Feuer, o Ursprung der Liebe, BWV 34

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sainsf in topic GA Review

Text poet

edit

If we mention only Bible text in the infobox, it looks as if all text was biblical, while it is only three words. I think even if we don't know the name of the author we could do justice to his achievements, at the same time establishing the link to Cantata texts. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's probably undue for only three words - removed. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
As you wish, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:O ewiges Feuer, o Ursprung der Liebe, BWV 34/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I can do this today. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead
  • You may like to link alto, oboes, continuo
yes but better in Baroque instruments, ok, alto yes --GA
  • What are the "both occasions"?
should "wedding and Pentecost" be repeated? --GA
Looks better now, you discussed it in the earlier paragraph, so it wasn't immediately clear what you were talking about. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
History and words
  • I think it should be "Bach scholar", not "the Bach scholar".
That seems to be an American/English thing, - Tim would like the "the" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I think I didn't notice the "the" in your earlier articles. Tim riley seems to be away for a month. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

This lists some dead links : [1] @Gerda Arendt: I think we need dead URL templates here or search for new versions of the URLs. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 16:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

No, we don't - the links work fine if you click on them from the article. The problem is actually that Checklinks doesn't know how to parse links with square brackets in them. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for correcting me. Seeing no more issues, I am glad to promote this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:51, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's it. Great job! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply