Talk:North Acropolis, Tikal

Active discussions
North Acropolis, Tikal has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 15, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA ReviewEdit

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Acropolis, Tikal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 14:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Will review this tomorrow.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 19:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Lead
  • aound -typo
  • "the tombs of Yax Nuun Ayiin I, Siyaj Chan K'awiil II, Wak Chan K'awiil and "Animal Skull"." dates of rule or burial in brackets after each would be useful here.
  • My feeling is that you need to elaborate more on the monuments to effectively summarize the article.
Late preclassic
  • Wikilink Late Preclassic .
Postclassic
  • Strange to begin section with "However".
Structures
  • No estimated dates for construction date of 27-31?
  • I've dropped in some dates; in some cases this is pretty vague since not all of these structures have been excavated. Simon Burchell (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Burial 48
  • The king wwas -typo
plaster of paris

Paris is capitalized in the dictionary for plaster of Paris I believe.

Looks in good shape overall, most interesting, especially the red painted skull.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review - I've fixed the simple stuff and will come back and do the rest tomorrow. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 21:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, I think I've dealt with everything - if not, please let me know. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

That's great - many thanks! All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Return to "North Acropolis, Tikal" page.