Work edit

I will add more to this page soon. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 13:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just added a whole bunch and pretty much cleaned the page up. Will keep an eye on it and add more sporadically. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 19:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is she a Scientologist? edit

The part of the 'Personal life' section about Tom Cruise would suggest she is a Scientologist herself, and should be placed in Category:American Scientologists. But does anyone have a source where she specifically identifies herself as such? If it's only attributed to third-party sources, we can't add it. However, I'll add the WikiProject template in any case. Robofish (talk) 15:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Generally she looks to be tight-lipped about the matter, but it looks pretty firm that she was one but is no longer. Although I was hesitant adding Category:Former Scientologists as she still could be an Independent Scientologist.--T. Anthony (talk) 03:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

She confirmed to The New York Post in October 2013 that she is not a Scientologist: http://nypost.com/2013/10/23/who-needs-tom-cruise-scientology-gal-speaks-out/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tractor21 (talkcontribs) 00:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Before Nazanin Boniadi was affiliated with Amnesty International USA, when she was still a Scientologist, she was an activist for Artists for Human Rights, an organization founded by Anne Archer, a long time member of the Church of Scientology. [Artists for Human Rights] is a group with a Board of Directors comprised primarily, if not exclusively, of prominent members of the Church of Scientology, including Michael Wisner and Donna Isham, wife of Mark Isham, all of whom are well known members of the Scientology organization. --Exhausted200 (talk) 18:49, 1 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tractor21 (talkcontribs) Reply

User Tractor21: There is no specific statement by Boniadi in the New York Post article mentioned above about about having been a Scientologist or leaving. The publication is not a reliable news source. Everything on this subject seems to be from third party sources. Until she speaks on the subject it is unconformable either way. User Exhausted200: People may support organizations without knowing their background. This also doesn't confirm she is or was a Scientologist. Working with or having Scientologist friends does not make her a Scientologist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1000Correct (talkcontribs) 15:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I would greatly appreciate if Tractor21 would stop deleting and/or altering my posts here. I find this behavior bizarre and leading to more questions about Tractor21 and her/his edits more than ever. Why are you doing this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exhausted200 (talkcontribs) 16:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

In response to user Exhausted200: Please follow WP:BLP regarding tone, neutrality and sourcing. Your edits to date have included personal opinions and unverifiable inferences such as stating that Boniadi was "mentored by Ann Archer" or suggesting that her association with Artists for Human Rights makes her a Scientologist (past or present). This violates Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, not an op-ed. Some of the information you added is not available on public domain which raises questions regarding its accuracy and sourcing. I have not deleted information you have added that can be easily verified. For example, I did not find any references on the public domain that confirmed Boniadi was named a "spokesperson" for Artists for Human Rights, however, I found other information which suggests she was associated with them in the past, so I changed the word "spokesperson" to "activist" for Artists for Human Rights and left that information on the page. Also, per WP:BLP "Biographies of living persons ("BLP"s) must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid." I hope this helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tractor21 (talkcontribs) 19:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Iranian actress or Iranian-born British-American actress? edit

The beginning of the article implies that she is an actress in Iran without ties to Britain or the U.S. Since she resides in the U.S. and is an actress in the U.S., wouldn't be more accurate to state that she is Iranian born but a British-American actress? Or an American actress? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.176.27.113 (talk) 19:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think it should definitely be changed from "Iranian actress" because of the reasons you mentioned. "Iranian-born British-American actress" seems right because she grew up in the UK and lives in the US. --Liquidmetalrob (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nazanin Boniadi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply