Talk:Nate Robinson

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SlayerofOrcs in topic Fourth Child

Untitled

edit

Can we add a list of other "short" nba stars? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.231.97 (talkcontribs)

-There's a list of players under six feet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.176.28.208 (talkcontribs)

Nate Robinson's Height

edit

There seems to be some misinformation about Nate's height... he is not 5' 9". He is 5' 7.75", 5' 9" with shoes which is a big difference. http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Nate-Robinson-67/ he was measured 5' 7.75" barefoot at his 2005 nba combine. I have changed the first paragraph to list him at 5' 7.75" without shoes, but i'll leave 5' 9" on his right sidebar (as that is the nba.com stat) to avoid confusion when comparing nba profiles. Ruick (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

A whole section for Slam Dunk Contests?

edit

Is there any real justification for having a whole section devoted to Robinson's slam dunk contest performance? Granted, it's the only professional award he's won, and the way he won it was somewhat controversial (though that's more relevant to the contest rather than the player), but for players, winning an All Star weekend contest is, at best, a minor footnote in a career - after all, Robinson is a professional basketball player, not a professional slam dunk competitor. I don't think it warrants more than a mention in the intro. Ytny (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's perfectly justified because it actually happened and because it's well-documented, and frankly, it's one of his few accomplishments. If undue weight is an issue, then I'd suggest expanding the article in general. hateless 01:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
No. See WP's policy about recent events i.e. 'recentism'. Tjrover (talk) 21:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I would even say it is very justified and important because in a game of freakishly tall and big athletes, he is tiny. He is even smaller than the average man yet dunks, which is a tall mans thing if there ever was a thing, better than anyone... DWood 06:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Repiceman89 (talkcontribs)

Nate Robinson Vertical

edit

Nate Robinson's Vertical is at least 48 inches(4 feet) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.197.231.1 (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Fair enough. But you have to cite a reliable source. Currently, our source says 43.5 inches and that's what we're going with. --Ytny (talk) 04:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

What happened to nate's myspace?

Fair use rationale for Image:A robinson 268.jpg

edit
 

Image:A robinson 268.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

height

edit

It says here he is 5'9. The linked source says he is 5'7 and 3/4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.20.37.176 (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Number at the Celtics

edit

Number 2 is retired for Red Auerbach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.9.133 (talk) 22:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Locked for editing?

edit

Are you kidding me? Why is Nate Robinson of all people locked for editing on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.12.154.21 (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't seem to be locked for everyone. Only for unestablished users. Acmilan10italia (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Personal Life

edit

Nate has a whole internet series called state of nate on youtube, as well as being an active user on instagram can we say something about that--Brohde15 (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nate Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nate Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fourth Child

edit

Apparently he has a fourth child from an affair. I haven't found any mainstream news sites reporting on this, but it seems to have been confirmed via his Instagram. Here's a source: http://www.inflexwetrust.com/2016/01/26/nate-robinson-begs-his-girlfriend-on-ig-to-forgive-him-for-getting-sidechick-pregnant/

Also not sure whether this is considered notable but he was fined by the NBA for complaining about the officials, source: https://www.cbc.ca/sports/basketball/nba/nate-robinson-fined-25-000-by-nba-for-comments-1.2454269 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlayerofOrcs (talkcontribs) 02:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply