Talk:Nanai language

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Voiced/unvoiced or aspirated/unaspirated? edit

I think An messed up his IPA; he says on p11 "The plosives and fricatives are all unvoiced, and are distinguished by aspiration"; which means, for example, we should see:

  • k and kʰ, not g and k
  • tʂ and (I think) tʂʰ, not dʐ and tʂ
  • et cetera ad nauseum

Anyone have a better idea whether his statement about no voiced consonants is true? cab 13:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Quite true in principle. However, the same is basically true of English, and yet one typically uses [g] and [k] when transcribing English in IPA. Perhaps there is a similar situation with Nanai.—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 23:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

additional info at http://lingsib.iea.ras.ru/en/languages/nanai.shtml

Orthography Section edit

I’m curious about the Cyrillic orthography as given in the article. It seems to be plain Russian, missing at least the letter ӈ as in the word наӈдаку. Looking at the phonology section, I’m guessing there are a few other letters missing here. Does anyone have the complete orthography? languagegeek (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Influence on other languages edit

The Nanai word "Amba", which means "Siberian Tiger", has made its way into the Russian language and is used sometimes. See also, the Amba River. Esn (talk) 03:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nanai language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply