Talk:Myat Phaya Gyi

Latest comment: 1 year ago by BorgQueen in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Princess Myat Phaya Gyi
  • ... that the Burmese princess Myat Phaya Gyi (pictured) cohabited with a palace servant, gave up her royal princess insignia, and lived a life of great poverty and extreme loneliness until her death? Source: Shah, Sudha (2012). The king in exile : the fall of the royal family of Burma. New Delhi. pp. 40–45. ISBN 978-93-5029-598-4. OCLC 962026050.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

Created by Taung Tan (talk). Self-nominated at 16:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Myat Phaya Gyi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   The size and freshness is good for DYK. The prose is well referenced and no copyvio was observed. The article reads "Myat Phaya Gyi fell in love with Gopal Bhaurao Sawant, an Indian palace gatekeeper, in 1906, when she was 26 years old, and had a child with him. At the time, he was already married." It's not clear how they married if the guy had a wife and the sentence implies the two had child before marriage. Please correct me if it's wrong. Also waiting for the QPQ. --Mhhossein talk 06:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Mhhossein, The reason why the princess never married him was because he already had a legal wife, which she was unaware of during their love affair. During that time, the gatekeeper pretended to be single in order to win the heart of the princess. Taung Tan (talk) 18:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the explanations Taung Tan, so why does the hook say they got married? --Mhhossein talk 06:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
My apology my misatke. fixed. Taung Tan (talk) 08:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Please let me know when you're done with your QPQ. --Mhhossein talk 06:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Mhhossein: Just to make you aware, Taung Tan is currently indeffed for sockpuppetry, so said QPQ is unlikely to occur anytime soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the notice, Iazyges. --Mhhossein talk 07:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Has a QPQ been provided yet? I'm willing to donate one for this nomination if one has not been provided yet. Pamzeis (talk) 02:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
No, the original nominator has been indefinitely banned. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 16:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  •   Tagged references to "marriage" as dubious in article, per the discussion above. Cielquiparle (talk) 13:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Mhhossein, I fixed the wording in the absence of Taung Tan. I think the issue has been addressed now. Thank you. Htanaungg (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply