Talk:Moussa Dembélé (French footballer)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Impending transfer edit

As per WP:CRYSTALBALL he shouldn't have his current club details changed to Tottenham until it's actually happened. In fact, his current club should continue to be marked as Fulham because the deal means he stays there on loan (marking him as currently playing for his loan club as usual for on-loan players - see Wikipedia pages for any number of on-load players, such as Victor Moses, Alexandre Pato and Carl Jenkinson).

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smoothy (talkcontribs) 19:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply 
And further, this is a great illustration of the stupidity of changing club details before it actually happens - Dembélé isn't even actually going to be signed by Spurs Smoothy (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Moussa Dembélé (Belgian footballer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 August 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. No evidence that first move is a COMMONNAME and that the latter is factually wrong, to answer, factual accuracy > COMMONNAME. --QEDK (T C)


– I originally made this move request on the Belgian player's talk page. Only one opposition was made (and from an IP which was created that same day and has made no edits since, so possibly a sock puppet). Soccerbase, the KBVB, ESPN, the Premier League and Tottenham's own website all refer to the Belgian as Mousa, not Moussa. Unreal7 (talk) 21:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I support this move, which is (on the part of the Belgian footballer) nothing more than restoring the way it was until 20 June 2016‎. The move on that date should simply not have happened in the first place. –Sygmoral (talk) 23:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – Too much confusion potential if names are only distinguished by a single or double "s". I would advocate a {{distinguish}} hatnote on both pages (only one has it now). — JFG talk 23:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
His name isn't Moussa, though. See John Snow as another example of WP:SMALLDETAILS. Unreal7 (talk) 08:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose moving the French footballer, Support moving the Belgian one back whence it came, with the proviso that both pages carry a distinguish hatnote. The COMMONNAME of the Belgian one appears to use a single s, although his "real" name does have a double s, as the player himself confirms in ref#1 from his article, and is also confirmed by documents that use the subject's real name, as FIFA's World Cup squad list and his registration with the English Football Association. Additionally, the British media aren't consistent about using the single-s spelling for the Belgian. There's a genuine potential for confusion, so using just footballer as a disambiguator wouldn't be helpful to the reader, which is what these things are actually there for. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per JFG. Too much potential for confusion. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:47, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Note: Opposition to moving the French player is clear, but moving the Belgian player seems feesible. Unreal7 (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Individual awards edit

Hello @Robby.is.on:, would you care to expand on your removal of the individual honours from Dembélé's page. It's commonplace across the project for monthly awards issued by the league to be included. Even Alex Ferguson has monthly awards included, which are definitely considered a significant accolade see this discussion at the Wikiproject where their significance was briefly discussed. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 21:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi @DUCKISJAMMMY:, I am afraid I am not able to point you to a relevant discussion or a page which mentions this convention. But I can tell you that Thierry Henry, a featured article, doesn't feature monthly awards and that I have seen individual awards being removed from the Mesut Özil page repeatedly. Regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Robby.is.on: Henry's page currently includes monthly awards, have you any idea who removed Özil's and what rationale they used. I can't see anything in the talkpage's archive, so it may not of been discussed. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 21:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oh, right you are, Henry's article indeed lists "Premier League Player of the Month" and "MLS Player of the Month". I have checked the edit history for Özil and found this (by @Jaellee:), this (by @Shreerajtheauthor:) and this (also by Jaellee). There may be more. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
In that case, I'll raise the issue at WP:FOOTY tomorrow, hopefully we'll get a clear consensus one way or the other. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
That would be great! :-) Thanks, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Moussa Dembélé Fulham.jpg edit

Is the man in this image actually Moussa Dembélé? As per the match report, Dembélé was not involved in the matchday squad, and to me the man looks like Ryheem Sheckleford, who did play. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Moussa Dembélé (French footballer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply